Currently,
the Standard Model of physics accurately predicts only about 4% of our universe. The other 96% is "missing" and
composed of "dark matter" and "dark energy". Perhaps what
is missing is the incredibly abundant energy that exists within SPACE itself. It is missing from their equations because of something included in the
standard model known as "renormalization" where they effectively swept the
infinite density of the vacuum of space under the rug mathematically and then
proceeded with their equations as if this energy were not important to include
in a theory that is supposed to, by definition, include everything.
When the energy that exists in the vacuum of space
itself is properly accounted for then the need to throw in this "missing
new type of matter" that was invented out of thin air and added to the
standard model to make the model work is no longer necessary. When including
the incredible amount of energy present in the fabric of the vacuum itself,
then one can calculate that the proton, for example, has enough mass-energy
inside of it's volume to create a tiny singularity in its center: a mini black
hole.
See Nassim Haramein's paper "The
Schwarzschild proton" for the details of this theory that shows that only
a very small percentage (~10-39%) of the vacuum fluctuations available within a
proton volume need be cohered and converted to mass-energy in order for the
proton to meet the Schwarzschild condition of a black hole. The Schwarzschild proton paper .pdf :
http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/AIP_CP_SProton_Haramein.pdf
The disappearance act
of ROC
- radius
of curvature of all natural law (1903-1904 E.T. Whittaker), hugely assisted by Heaveside and Gibbs, and subsequently
swept under the rug by the continued
use of the mathematical renormalization (clown?), helped create today’s contemporary
standard model farce of modern physics.
T.E. Bearden
Association of Distinguished American Scientists
2311 Big Cove Road, Huntsville, Alabama 35801
Walter Rosenthal
4876 Bethany Lane, Santa Maria, California 93455
Copyright © 1991 by T.E. Bearden
& W. Rosenthal, All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
Unrecognized for
what it was, in 1903-1904 E.T. Whittaker (W) published a fundamental,
engineerable theory of electrogravitation (EG) in two profound papers. The
first (W-1903) demonstrated a hidden bidirectional EM wave structure in the
scalar potential of vacuum, and showed how to produce a standing scalar EM
potential wave -- the same wave discovered experimentally four years earlier by
Nikola Tesla. W-1903 is a hidden variable theory that shows how to
deterministically curve the local and/or distant space-time using EM. W-1904
shows that all force field EM can be replaced by interferometry of two scalar
potentials, anticipating the Aharonov-Bohm effect by 55 years and extending it
to the engineerable macroscopic world. W-1903 shows how to turn EM into
G-potential, curve local and/or distant space-time, and directly engineer the
virtual particle flux of vacuum. W-1904 shows how to turn G-potential and
curvature of space-time back into force-field EM, even at a distance. The
papers implement Sakharov's 1968 statement that gravitation is not a
fundamental field of nature, but a conglomerate of other fields. Separately
applied to electromagnetics (EM), quantum mechanics (QM), and general
relativity (GR), an extended superset of each results. The three supersets are
Whittaker-unified, so that a testable, engineerable, unified field theory is
generated. EM, QM, and GR each contained a fundamental error that blocked
unification, and these three errors are explained. The Schroedinger potential
can also be structured and altered, indicating the direct engineering of
physical quantum change. Recently Ignatovich has pointed out this hidden
bidirectional EM wave structure in the Schroedinger potential, without
referencing Whittaker's 1903 discovery of the basic effect. The potential for
applying the new approach to explain the nature of mind and thought, and
providing a laboratory-testable theory for them, is briefly noted and indicative
major references cited. Some of the possible implications for physics and
biology are pointed out.
Note the problems/issues
regarding scale invariance always appear at extremely large and small scales –
differentials approaching, at, and exceeding the equivalent of the QC, velocity
of light energy differential
Scale Invariance Thomas E. Phipps, Jr. ... undertook both theoretical studies and
various small-scale ... How legitimate is it to treat first-order invariance
problems by second ... link
here
This link is not
authorized by Yahoo! If
you would like to continue to this link's intended destination at your own risk, click here.
Plasma
physicist Eric Lerner says that although the standard model makes valid
predictions within broad limits of accuracy, it has no practical application
beyond justifying the construction of ever-larger particle accelerators http://www.davidpratt.info/farce.htm
Excerpts
·
Note the scale conditions when the flip goes from positive attraction
to negative; Note also, Heaveside
preferred complex numbers and the square root of -1, rather than deal with the
QC as the radius of curvature of all natural law.
·
The weak nuclear force is a very curious type of ‘force’. Many
orders of magnitude weaker than the electromagnetic force, it is responsible
for radioactivity and hydrogen fusion, and supposedly converts neutrons into
protons by tampering with quarks. The strong nuclear
force between neutrons and protons is also very peculiar. Up to a distance of
around 10-15 m (1 fermi), it is very strongly repulsive, keeping
nucleons apart. Then, for unknown reasons, it
abruptly becomes very strongly attractive, before dropping off very rapidly.
Current theory claims that this somehow results from the inter-quark gluon
force ‘leaking’ out of the nucleon. Obviously if quarks don’t exist no force is
required to hold them together. As for the force holding protons and neutrons
together, some alternative theories argue that there are no neutrons
in the atomic nucleus, only positive and negative charges held together by
ordinary electrostatic forces.10
·
‘the Maxwell theory fails many experimental tests and
has only a limited range of validity ... The fanatical belief in the validity
of Maxwell’s theory for all situations, like the fanatical belief in “special
relativity”, which is purported to be confirmed by the Maxwell theory,
continues to hamper the progress in physics.’1
Pioneering scientists and inventors Paulo and Alexandra Correa show that
Maxwell’s fundamental errors included the wrong dimensional units for magnetic and
electric fields and for current – ‘two epochal errors now reproduced for over a
century, and which have done much to arrest the development of field theory’.2
·
Meanwhile, symmetry had been superseded by supersymmetry (or
SUSY), which is rooted in the concept of spin. The basic idea is that matter
particles (fermions) and force-carrier particles (bosons) are not really two
different kinds of particles, but one. Each elementary fermion is assumed to
have a boson superpartner with identical properties except for mass and spin.
For each quark there is a squark, for each lepton a slepton, for each gluon a
gluino, for each photon a photino, etc. In addition, for the bosonic Higgs
field it is necessary to postulate a second set of Higgs fields with a second
set of superpartners.
·
A major problem is that these new particles (known as ‘sparticles’)
cannot have the same masses as the particles already known, otherwise they
would have already been observed; they must be so heavy that they could not
have been produced by current accelerators. This means that supersymmetry must
be a spontaneously broken symmetry, and this is said to be a disaster for the
supersymmetric project as it would require a vast array of new particles and
forces on top of the new ones that come from supersymmetry itself. This
completely destroys the ability of the theory to predict anything.
·
The reigning theory is that at the moment of the big bang the
entire universe – including space itself – exploded into being out of nowhere
in a random quantum fluctuation. Before it started to expand, it measured just
10-33 cm across, and had infinite temperature and density. The main
piece of evidence for this fairytale is that ‘space is expanding’. But no one
has ever directly measured any expansion of space. The standard view is that
space does not in fact expand within our own solar system or galaxy or within
our local group of galaxies or even our own cluster of galaxies; instead, it
only expands between clusters of galaxies – where, conveniently, there
is no earthly chance of making any direct observations to confirm or refute it.
Since space is surely infinite, how can it get any bigger?
·
As already mentioned, some physicists speak of a
‘quantum ether’. This refers to two things: 1) the zero-point field (ZPF), i.e.
fluctuating electromagnetic radiation fields produced by random quantum
fluctuations that, according to quantum theory, persist even at a temperature
of absolute zero (-273°C); 2) innumerable pairs of short-lived ‘virtual’
particles (such as electrons and positrons), sometimes called the ‘Dirac sea’.
Formally, every point of space should contain an infinite amount of zero-point
energy. By assuming a minimum wavelength of electromagnetic vibrations, the
energy density of the ‘quantum vacuum’ has been reduced to the still
astronomical figure of 10108 joules per cubic centimetre.
·
Although various experimental results are widely
interpreted as consistent with the existence of zero-point energy, further work
is needed to test the theory and alternative explanations. Some scientists have
theorized that mass, inertia, and gravity are all connected with the
fluctuating electromagnetic energy of the ZPF. However, the ZPF itself is
usually regarded as the product of matter-energy, which supposedly originated
in the ‘big bang’, whereas modern ether theories generally hold that physical
matter crystallizes out of or dissolves back into the preexisting ether. At
present the only verified all-pervasive electromagnetic energy field is the
cosmic microwave background radiation, which is commonly hailed as the
afterglow of the big bang, but is also explicable as the temperature of space,
or rather of the ether.3
·
Paul LaViolette has developed a theory known as
‘subquantum kinetics’, which replaces the 19th-century concept of a mechanical,
inert ether with that of a continuously transmuting ether.4
Physical subatomic particles and energy quanta are pictured as wavelike or
vortex-like concentration patterns in the ether. A particle’s gravitational and
electromagnetic fields are said to result from the fluxes of different kinds of
etheric particles, or etherons, across their boundaries, and the associated
etheron concentration gradients.
·
LaViolette believes that an etheric subatomic particle
might resemble the vorticular structures that theosophists Annie Besant and
Charles Leadbeater observed during their clairvoyant examination of atoms from
1895 to 1933. They called these objects ‘ultimate physical atoms’ (UPAs), which
they considered to be the basic unit of physical matter, existing on the
seventh and highest (‘atomic’) subplane of our physical plane; they said that
any effort to dissociate a UPA further caused it to disappear from our own
plane of reality.5
MOVING BACK TO NORMAL
(BUT NOT RENORMALIZATION)
CONSIDERATION OF THE LARGER FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF LIGHT AND ITS
RELATIVES: SPACE TIME MASS MATTER ENERGY GRAVITY/(FIELDS)
Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law:
·
Light: 186,000 miles per second (energy differential)
·
Light2: The Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law –
a sine wave, positive/negative, characterizing the nature of every natural law
·
Light3: The kinetic energy equivalent of the mass
energy of matter
·
Light4: The Big Blink Inward - Gravitational, 186,000 per sec;
Outward - Radiation, 186,000 per second
·
Light5:
Haramein / Rauscher’s (reference below) derivation that protons
orbiting the nucleus of an atom at the speed of light in a vacuum are
essentially a black hole
The universe
has a fundamental structure (geometry) and a fundamental dynamic (spin). Here
is an excellent image to show how these two fundamental principals interact. If
you make two phi spirals out from a central point, each in opposite directions,
their intersecting points outline the nodal points of a star tetrahedron, a
geometry that is the seed of the fabric of the vacuum: an infinite
t etrahedral
array.
8
star-tetrahedrons put together creates a 64 tetrahedron grid, forming two octaves of what Buckminster Fuller called the
"vector-equilibrium", otherwise known as the cube octahedron, that
are nested inside each-other. 64 is fewest number of tetrahedrons you need to
begin to see what is an infinite scalar fractal geometry that is the underlying
geometric structure of the fabric of the entire universe.
The
Resonance Project ~ Nassim Haramein ~ Fractal
Enlightenment
