Energy Evolution Program

Showing posts with label ZPE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ZPE. Show all posts

Friday, June 2, 2017

The interchangeability of space, time, mass, matter, energy, fields (grav elec mag)

In a very high magnetic field a 'massless' electron can acquire a mass




An international team of researchers have for the first time, discovered that in a very high magnetic field an electron with no mass can acquire a mass. Understanding why elementary particles e.g. electrons, photons, neutrinos have a mass is a fundamental question in Physics and an area of intense debate. This discovery by Prof Stefano Sanvito, Trinity College Dublin and collaborators in Shanghai was published in the prestigious journal Nature Communications this month. (full article)

The 'interchangeability of space, time, mass, matter, energy, fields (grav elec mag)' regulated by the quantity C (light) is the fundamental concept towards a more comprehensive (3D) view of our current and limited perception of E=MC2.

The progress toward this larger view which provide application feasibilities to field propulsion, anti-gravity, movement from one point to another (without going through all points in between) and opening countless other scientific doors, including medical ...... seems to be taking an overly extended, unnatural, time frame.

The following few chapters (links) were written at a fourth grade level of comprehension, so complexity is not the issue.



The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:



Sunday, March 19, 2017

Counterintuitive Motion of Electrons Bypassing the 'All Points in Between' requirement

More on the confused topics of 'action at a distance', 'simultaneity', 'quantum entanglement', and 'movement from one point to another without going through all points in between'.

 "Common sense might dictate that for an object to move from one point to another, it must go through all the points on the path. Not so for electrons in the quantum world, which don't follow such common-sense rules for the most part. Electrons can show up on the first floor, then the third floor, without ever having been on the second floor," Zhao said.

Illustration of laser beam triggering quantum movement of electrons between top and bottom layers, bypassing middle layer. The new tri-layer material from KU's Ultrafast Laser Lab material someday could lead to next-generation electronics. Image courtesy Frank Ceballos and University of Kansas.


Quantum movement of electrons in atomic layers shows potential of materials for electronics and photonics
by Staff WritersLawrence KS (SPX) Mar 17, 2017

.............................................

The creation of 'border walls', AKA continued dissection, separation, and isolation of the micro, meso, and macro scientific realms, without periodic integration will sustain the confusion in 'entanglement', black hole, wormhole, etc., theories, while keeping scientific advancement on a short trivia stick, as major advancements in energy evolution - from medical research to propulsion systems - remain dormant.

Contemporary status summary on 'entanglement':
NIST team proves 'spooky action at a distance' is really real
Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance


The road to integration of the micro, meso, macro realms mandates a larger view of light, the quantity C, in E=MC2

Summation of Fundamental Principle VC:

•        The quantity C (velocity of light) is the radius of curvature of all natural law, the pivotal point upon which the natural laws become manifest, the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter.
•        The Quantity C is the radius of curvature of all natural law, meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.
•        While we have repeatedly referred to the quantity C as an energy differential, we have heretofore considered it only in terms of kinetic energy. Some may believe that it can be reached only when there is a rate of increase or decrease in the degree of spatial separation between the reference points, equal to 3x10(10) centimeters per second, or in simpler terms, a velocity equal to that of light. It is necessary therefore to point out the fact that an energy differential does not necessarily manifest itself as a velocity. It can also exist as a frequency. Our present laws of physics state that the energy level upon which an electron, a photon, or other particle exists is proportionate to its frequency. The mathematical rule is E equals Fh, where E is the energy, F is the frequency and h is a factor called Planck's constant.
 We can now see that a frequency differential which by the above formula is equal to 9x10(20) ergs per gram also represents the quantity C. When such a frequency differential exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, we again find that the natural laws at the observed point reach zero value with respect to the observer. If the frequency differential exceeds this value, the action of the laws will become negative. A material object such as a spacecraft upon or near the surface of the earth would cease to exist as matter and would enter the plane of energy insofar as the observer on earth was concerned, but as we have previously pointed out, an observer upon or within the object, whose frequency or energy level had been raised to the same degree as that of the craft, would be unable to detect any change.
 We must clear our minds of the thought block produced by the assumption that the quantity C is a factor of absolute limit. We must realize that it is a limiting factor only with respect to two given reference points, and that it is perfectly possible to conceive of a series of consecutive reference points between each two of which a differential equal to the quantity C may exist.
•        The simple unity of matter and energy: Consider a geometric plane surface having two dimensions. If this plane is perpendicular to your line of sight you perceive it as a plane surface, the matter aspect. If now you rotate the plane through an angle of ninety degrees, the surface will disappear from your sight, leaving only one dimension, the energy aspect. You have not changed the plane in any way. You have merely changed your point of view, or technically, you have changed your point of reference. The amount of energy which is apparently contained by a given body of matter depends entirely upon how far it has rotated upon the mass energy axis (defined by the quantity C, the radius of curvature of all natural law) with respect to the given observer. Another observer, observing the same body from a different reference point, would find an entirely different amount of energy.
•        ENERGY: We will define energy as the ability to create changes in the position or condition of objects or points of reference. However, energy can create change, only when there exists a differential in the two points between which the change becomes manifest, or when the unit of energy has become divided into its two component parts called poles, or charges. One positive and one negative pole or charge, when united, constitute one photon or quantum of energy. (see definitions  of the natural laws: space time mass matter energy gravity)

We have the resources to test (and retest previous classified attempts) the 3 D version of E=mc2, identifying C as the Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law.

World View 101: National Ignition Facility, Crystals




Friday, November 25, 2016

A Tale of the Flat, 2D Stalemated Version of E=MC2 with non-variable light speed

A physics question: To USE crutches and invent artificial (non-existent) foundational bridges to support flawed and misinterpreted theory, OR NOT? With a 3D view of E=MC2, artificial addons are not required to better understand reality.

Good to know: any number of observations, if made on a sufficiently limited scale, will tend to indicate that the earth is flat, rather than spherical.


A theory by Imperial physicists that the speed of light is variable - and not constant as Einstein suggested - could soon be put to the test.  






The testability of the varying speed of light theory sets it apart from the more mainstream rival theory: inflation. Inflation says that the early universe went through an extremely rapid expansion phase, much faster than the current rate of expansion of the universe. These theories are necessary to overcome what physicists call the 'horizon problem'. The universe as we see it today appears to be everywhere broadly the same, for example it has a relatively homogenous density.

A clearer, "more real" view using a refined, broader, 3D version of E=mc2 
Through the concept of the curvature of physical law, however, we see that the addition of mass to an existing body does not, necessarily, increase the force of attraction between its parts, but may, under certain conditions, cause the field to become negative, and the attraction to become a repulsion. We can explain the observed actions of the present universe by postulating that an attraction exists between the individual bodies within a galaxy, because their total mass and distance is such that they are within the positive portion of the gravitation curve with respect to each other. In the vast spaces between the galaxies however, the curve dips below the zero line with the result that a repulsion exists between the galaxies themselves.  This also explains why matter, although rather evenly distributed throughout the known universe, is not distributed uniformly, but found in quite similar concentrations at comparatively regular distances.

This could only be true if all regions of the universe were able to influence each other. However, if the speed of light has always been the same, then not enough time has passed for light to have travelled to the edge of the universe, and 'even out' the energy.

The alternative theory is inflation, which attempts to solve this problem by saying that the very early universe evened out while incredibly small, and then suddenly expanded, with the uniformity already imprinted on it. While this means the speed of light and the other laws of physics as we know them are preserved, it requires the invention of an 'inflation field' -- a set of conditions that only existed at the time.

















Light doesn't always travel at the speed of light. A new experiment reveals that focusing or manipulating the structure of light pulses reduces their speed, even in vacuum conditions. Generally if light is not traveling at c it is because it is moving through a material. For example, light slows down when passing through glass or water.

A clearer, "more real" view using a refined, broader, 3D version of E=mc2 
The quantity C is considered to be a constant, in fact the only constant which has survived in a relativistic world. In almost every text book on physics in the world today the statement is made that the quantity C represents the velocity of light (in centimeters per second), yet every student in the world who has studied the subject, knows that the velocity of light is not a constant. That its velocity, in fact, varies slightly with each different medium through which it is propagated. There are many who will dispute the statement that the change in velocity varies with the frequency, but when sufficiently precise tests are made entirely within a single medium, the results indicate convincingly that this is true. 

Fortunately there is a value to which the quantity C can be assigned which is a constant. Moreover the assignment of the quantity C to this factor makes possible a much better understanding of the natural laws involved in the propagation of energy. The quantity C is actually the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter. In other words, if we take a gram (or any other quantity of matter: Newtonian mass) and convert that matter gradually into energy according to the formula E = MC2, and the resultant energy, as it appeared, were constantly applied to the remaining matter in such a way as to accelerate it uniformly in a given direction, when all the matter had been so converted we would find that we had zero Newtonian mass, infinite inertial mass and a resultant velocity equal to the quantity C, or approximately 3x10(10) centimeters per second (with respect to the given reference or starting point). The maximum velocity attained would always be the same regardless of the quantity of matter with which we started.



















Now, in a paper to be published 28 November in Physical Review, he and Niayesh Afshordi at the Perimeter Institute in Canada have laid out a new version of the idea – and this one is testable. They suggest that in the early universe, light and gravity propagated at different speeds.
If photons moved faster than gravity just after the big bang, that would have let them get far enough for the universe to reach an equilibrium temperature much more quickly, the team say.
A testable theory
What really excites Magueijo about the idea is that it makes a specific prediction about the cosmic microwave background (CMB). This radiation, which fills the universe, was created shortly after the big bang and contains a “fossilised” imprint of the conditions of the universe.

 

Once grounded in REAL, desperate attempts to support current flawed theory with offbeat, tangential artificial mathematical structures will cease to contribute and reinforce outdated confusion.



OF NOTE:  A paper published in The European Physical Journal H provides the first English translation and an analysis of one of Albert Einstein's little-known papers, "On the cosmological problem of the general theory of relativity." Published in 1931, it features a forgotten model of the universe, while refuting Einstein's own earlier static model of 1917. In this paper, Einstein introduces a cosmic model in which the universe undergoes an expansion followed by a contraction. A more coherent theory – see http://resonance.is/ 


In Summary: 

…… the quantity C (velocity of light) as the radius of curvature of all natural law, the pivotal point upon which the natural laws become manifest, the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter. Meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  
Field propulsion and antigravity become common sense, teleportation/quantum entanglement demystify, and erroneous limits dissolve, permitting application throughout the macro, meso, micro frames.
 …… We must clear our minds of the thought block produced by the assumption that the quantity C is a factor of absolute limit. We must realize that it is a limiting factor only with respect to two given reference points, and that it is perfectly possible to conceive of a series of consecutive reference points between each two of which a differential equal to the quantity C may exist.

…… The quantity C is the factor which will enable us to determine precisely the degree of change in the curvature of one law which will be brought about by a specified change in the application of the others.

 It is the factor which will eventually tell us how to place our spacecraft in either the positive or negative portion of the gravitational curve with respect to the earth or any other planet which we may choose to visit.

Towards more refined, jaw-dropping, seemingly miraculous, nuclear applications using frequencies and fields.

















The '3D' Version of E=mc2 




The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:





Friday, March 18, 2016

LIGHT: The 'great smoky dragon' of quantum physics

....














One may want to add some common sense upon a review of the ‘great smoky dragon’ of quantum physics.

Everything we observe, touch, feel, hear, experience, is a function of light - the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter - waves of the motion of light electrically conditioned and patterned manifesting though the appearance of space and time along the radius of curvature, the quantity c (light), in e=mc2.

One may then find far simpler, less destructive means of harnessing nuclear energies, i.e., extracting energy from the vacuum of zero point.


Understandably, the quantity C may boggle the mind when viewed from a ‘flatland’, narrow, unintegrated point of view, creating monstrous and erroneous interpretations (theories) of perfectly good math, such as dark energy, dark matter, black holes, wormholes, hundred million degree fluid key to fusion, and the like. (see back to fundamentals at bottom of post)
















In the 1970s, the American physicist John Archibald Wheeler (1911-2008) metaphorically compared the fundamental indefiniteness of quantum mechanical phenomena with a "great smoky dragon": One can see the tail, that is the source of the particles, and the head, which are the measurement results. But in between the whole body is covered in smoke. Image courtesy Xiao-song Ma. For a larger version of this image please go here.

Since the 17th century, science was intrigued by the nature of light. Isaac Newton was certain that it consists of a stream of particles. His contemporary Christiaan Huygens, however, argued that light is a wave. Modern quantum physics says that both were right. Light can be observed both as particles and as waves - depending which characteristic is measured in an experiment, it presents itself more as one or the other.

This so-called wave-particle dualism is one of the foundational principles of quantum physics. This questions our common sense: can one and the same indeed be of two contradictory natures at the same time?   ...more

Pitting one natural law against another,  i.e., such as bombing, blasting clubbing, disintegrating, continued application of the 700 year old 'rocket' propulsion concept, is such a labor intensive, wasteful, inefficient, primitive and destructive waste of time. 

Rather than fighting the natural laws, it behooves us to begin to understand them and make use of their fundamental properties and relationships which are still missing in the standard model - namely the natural laws are not absolute, but relative. That is the size and shape of the curve of one law is dependent upon the value and position of the others. 

Contemporary experiments mired in narrow, tangent points of view of light struggle on:









































FOR A FASTER MERGER PACE OF PAST AND PRESENT - Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses 
Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  

The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:

Saturday, October 4, 2014

Focus – Next Generation Propulsion within a larger Energy reality



Taking the fundamentals from a previous post “The Geometry of Form, the Connectivity of Space, and the Properties of Spin , we will now look at some theoretical possibilities whose applications could be accelerated if their concepts are unified with these fundamentals. We will, of course, have to include the tangential and isolated topics replicated below, which indeed open exploratory doors but lack full comprehension towards practical engineering applications:
Torsion fields
·        Now Come Torsion Fields
·        Torsion Field Articles
·        Experimental Detection
Heim Quantum Theory
·        The Basics of Heim Theory
Seriously flawed path of classical electrodynamics
Energy From The Vacuum
Rotation, SuperConduction, High Freq EM
·        The Physics of Anti-Gravity
+/- charges combined in Neutron, produce Grav field
·        Radius of Curvature
Zero Point
·        Calphysics Institute
·        The Bell Device


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------













A next generation quantum space propulsion system “….space is not a vacuum. Instead, it is filled with a roiling sea of particles and anti-matter particles that are created and then destroy themselves in a blink of an eye. This quantum effect can be harnessed via the dynamic Casimir effect.”     (to the skeptics - the concepts have validity of themselves – especially past the ‘flat math’ light obstacle of E=mc2….i.e., The Nonlinearity of Physical Law . 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



















LENR   Low Energy Nuclear Reaction Aircraft Investigator: Doug Wells, NASA Langley Research Center  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------











A new concept and design aspects of an ‘antigravity’ propulsion mechanism based on inertial forces





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------











Majorana fermion: Physicists observe elusive particle that is its own antiparticle
http://phys.org/news/2014-10-majorana-fermion-physicists-elusive-particle.html#nRlv

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------








OVAL Technologies – Advanced Propulsion and Gravity Control


An excellent intro inter-phasing Einstein, Tesla, Brown…………..














·        Understanding Light
 Thus not only do changing magnetism and changing electric field produce each other ( as per Maxwell's equations ) but a combination of electric field and magnetism produces change or movement of the fields themselves. This can be simplified into the statement, "Any changing electromagnetic field has the requirement of possessing an associated gravitational field." However, as will be shown, a gravitational field can exist independent of any electromagnetic field. Like electric field is associated with static charge, and magnetic field can be associated with static magnetic field, similarly there is an associated static case for gravitational field, mass.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LET’S BE THERE

 SCI FI A HALF CENTURY OLD NORMALLY WOULD BE REALIZED BY NOW.