Light’s Curved Bombshell Snags into "Multiverse" (sort of)

No takers to date on the next question:  Describe the actions of the natural laws (space time mass matter energy gravity) when frequency at VC or VC plus energy differentials are substituted for velocity between any two or more specified reference points? 



 The same postulated scientific explanations given for velocity – when approaching, at, and exceeding the speed of light - between any two or more reference points (i.e., ……time slows, stops, goes backwards, length loses dimension, mass approaches and becomes infinite)…… are to be considered/applied using the frequency differential, substituting for motion/velocity/acceleration. This exercise should promote an expanded self-recognition of the quantity C and the effects various aspects of space time mass matter energy gravity have upon each other, leading the way towards application. 

The “snag” “sort of” mentioned in the post title references the possible “multiverse” suggested by gravitational waves detected in the aftermath of the Big Bang. Multi-universes existing in the same time, space at different frequencies are noted throughout metaphysics.

This is not a “snag”, but an even broader viewpoint of the quantity C, the radius of curvature of all natural law, played out in the “as above, so below” metaphysical principle.

You will note from “the cosmic egg in your face", "the series of mathematical embarrassments” which the concept of 'multiverse' begins to expose, in spite of itself still trapped in a coordinate system incapable of handling scale variances and space time mass matter energy gravity relationships at VC levels or above.

Qualitative questioning of the old paradigm, the standard model of physics is accelerating, and the small flat science view is beginning to curve.

Big Bang Discovery Opens Doors to the "Multiverse"

Gravitational waves detected in the aftermath of the Big Bang suggest one universe just might not be enough. http://www.monroeinstitute.org/thehub/big-bang-discovery-opens-doors-to-the-multiverse

 

This illustration depicts a main membrane out of which individual universes arise; they then expand in size through time. Image credit: Moonrunner Design. From National Geographic Daily News  By Dan Vergano

In this multiverse spawned by "chaotic" inflation, the Big Bang is just a starting point, giving rise to multiple universes (including ours) separated by unimaginable gulfs of distance. How far does the multiverse stretch? Perhaps to infinity, suggests MIT physicist Max Tegmark, writing for Scientific American.

I'm a fan of the multiverse, but I wouldn't claim it is true," says Guth. Nevertheless, he adds, a multiverse explains a lot of things that now confuse cosmologists about our universe. For example, there is the 1998 discovery that galaxies in our universe seem to be spreading apart at an accelerating rate, when their mutual gravitational attraction should be slowing them down. This discovery, which garnered the 2011 Nobel Prize in physics, is generally thought to imply the existence of a "dark energy" that counteracts gravity on cosmic scales. Its nature is a profound mystery. About the only thing we understand about dark energy, physicists such as Michael Turner of the University of Chicago have long said, is its name.

A multiverse could wipe the cosmic egg off their faces. On the bell curve of all possible universes spawned by inflation, our universe might just happen to be one of the few universes in which the dark energy is relatively lame. In others, the antigravity force might conform to physicists' expectations and be strong enough to rip all matter apart.

 A multiverse might also explain away another embarrassment: the number of dimensions predicted by modern "superstring" theory. String theory describes subatomic particles as being composed of tiny strings of energy, but it requires there to be 11 dimensions instead of the four we actually observe. Maybe it's just describing all possible universes instead of our own. (It suggests there could be a staggeringly large number of possibilities—a 1 with 500 zeroes after it.)

Join the "multiverse club," Linde wrote in a March 9 review of inflationary cosmology, and what looks like a series of mathematical embarrassments disappears in a cloud of explanation. In a multiverse, there can be more things dreamt of in physicists' philosophy than happen to be found in our sad little heaven and earth.

 Spirit Into Matter — The Geometry of Life

THRIVE Movement          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXPpQmgD85E




 A new article from The Resonance Project's William Brown about how time may emerge from quantum entanglement has just been posted on resonance.is.



A colleague of Einstein, physicist John Archibald Wheeler, developed one of the first equations of quantum gravity in the early days of the unification of Relativity and Quantum Theory. Although it works, it does not incorporate time as a physical parameter, and physicists find this unsettling.

 In this context, it is referred to as the problem of time. As it suggests that time must be illusionary, and therefore the Universe is ultimately static and unchanging. In an attempt to reconcile this paradoxical result, a team of researchers have devised an experiment that may demonstrate, by analogy, how the Universe could be static and unchanging as a whole, at the largest scale, and yet have the experience of evolution in subsystems of the whole.

 They employ a version of a quantum erasure experiment, which utilizes quantum entanglement to erase information about which path a photon has traveled before detection, along with a sophisticated clock system - with one of the clocks actually being the pair of entangled photons. The researchers were able to experimentally show that when the pair of entangled photons are measured internally, as the clock system, they appear to change. However, when an external clock is used, and the path information is erased – it can be shown that the pair of entangled photons remain unchanged. If this experiment is taken to be an accurate model of Universal dynamics, it suggests that time may emerge from entanglement, such that if an observer is not entangled with a system, they will detect no net change in that system.

Read the full article here: http://resonance.is/change-for-a-paradigm-new-experiment-shows-how-time-may-emerge-from-quantum-entanglement/

 …………………………. Links
 Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law: 
 The Quantity C: Possessing a Significance Far Greater than Attributed
 Gravity – As Viewed Through the Radius (VC)
 Space as Observed through the Curve of Radius Light
 Matter and Mass - Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass
Beyond A Uni-Dimensional Perception of TIME
The Nonlinearity of Physical Law

  Recall: While we have repeatedly referred to the quantity C as an energy differential, we have heretofore considered it only in terms of kinetic energy. Some may believe that it can be reached only when there is a rate of increase or decrease in the degree of spatial separation between the reference points, equal to 3x10(10) centimeters per second, or in simpler terms, a velocity equal to that of light. It is necessary therefore to point out the fact that an energy differential does not necessarily manifest itself as a velocity. It can also exist as a frequency. Our present laws of physics state that the energy level upon which an electron, a photon, or other particle exists is proportionate to its frequency. The mathematical rule is E equals Fh, where E is the energy, F is the frequency and h is a factor called Planck's constant.

 While negative gravitational fields have been shown to exist, they have been found only within the atom and at inter-galactic distances. How can we place a space ship within the negative portion of the curve, with respect to the earth? The answer to this question lies in the fact that, as we have already learned, the natural laws are not absolute, but relative. That is, the size and shape of the curve of one law is dependent upon the value and position of the others. We have seen that the nucleus of the atom of uranium 235 dips below the zero line with the addition of only one mass unit, making a total of 236, yet the nucleus of the atom of uranium 238, although close to the zero line is still on the positive side of the curve because of the fact that the shape of the gravitational curve is modified not only by the mass present but also by the number and position of the electrical charges.

Lest someone charge us with ignorance by pointing out that there are the same number of electrons (92) in each of these atoms, we will make haste to state that we refer not only to the charges in the outer shell of the atom but to those within as well, and especially to the fact, not always realized, that the neutron possesses both a positive and a negative charge, although when united within the neutron they are not discernible as charges, but exist as energy which produces the gravitational field .

When we acquire a better understanding of the laws, we will be able to produce any shape of curve we desire, with the earth as one reference point and the spacecraft as the other.

Ivory Tower’s Massive Disconnect with Reality

Repost from Soundoff - another viewing point to assist in the gestation period, prior to the "Next Question"

Stepping back from the colossal influx, bombardment, of business’s “big ideas”, “innovation”, “active ingredients necessary for sustaining continuous innovation”, “using the power of certainty to drive growth in an uncertain world”, etc., etc., (from the experts) ............................we must ask, with all this novel input:

WHO THEN, IS CREATING THE COLLECTIVE, WORLDWIDE OUTPUT?

Is there a total disconnect, breakdown between “innovation”, “creativity” inputs, and the collective summation of output?

I concur, the eventual total destruction of all life IS a “BIG IDEA”, but positively is NOT “INNOVATION”

Business Projection Analysis Training for Dummies 

What obvious ingredients, so necessary to sustain life, progress and growth are completely and totally ignored in the present economic models of ego, greed, power and growth at all costs?

Where to “hell on earth” are these “experts” in their tiny reality box taking us? Blind to the absolutely insane, obscene worldwide wealth distribution and stagnant energy base?

A mind-boggling statistic about Wall Street bonuses

At $26.7 billion last year, they were almost twice what all of America's minimum-wage workers combined were paid.    March 17 5:30 AM  http://www.cbsnews.com/news/a-mind-boggling-statistic-about-wall-street-bonuses

And how can such an obvious deficit as a stagnant energy base - the CAUSE of the collective outcomes worldwide - be completely missed?

Common sense today tells us advanced, evolutionary, energy concepts would also bestow us with glaringly obvious “wisdom” options (science based moral & survival fibers) alerting us to the “uses”, the “sustainable, prosperous collective outcomes”, towards which our creations shall be put.

 

To date, big ideas and innovation inputs are giving us unsustainable outputs, a complete disconnect from the perceived reality we ‘think’ we are creating in the tiny isolated, ivory box of expertise. Profit, the bottom line, stands alone, the sole criteria for ‘truth’, ‘justice’, ‘righteousness’, ‘the Way’, with nary a consideration to the values required to sustain life itself.

 

Growth At All Costs

The predicament of industrial civilization.   John Greer, 16 March 2014



LOUIS HELBIG To understand the predicament of industrial civilization, it’s not enough to grasp the outward shape of the crisis of our time: the looting of a finite planet’s stock of resources, the destabilization of the global climate, the breathtaking cluelessness with which politicians, pundits, and ordinary citizens alike insist that the only way we can get out of this mess involves doing even more of the same things that got us into it in the first place, and the rest of it. Follow the roots of our predicament down into the soil that feeds them, and you’ll find yourself in a murky realm of unspoken narratives and unacknowledged desires—the “mind-forg’d manacles,” as Blake called them, that keep most of us shackled in place as the great rumbling vehicle of global industrial society accelerates down the slope of its decline and fall. Read the full piece here.  https://www.adbusters.org/magazine/112/growth-all-costs.html

The Collective Summation of Outcome

Repost from Evolution, Intelligent Design, Survival.  A step back, consolidate and re-evaluation primer - Is Energy Evolution a significant factor to the evolution and survival of Life?

The collective summation of OUTCOME determines the validity and quality of our “Big Ideas and Innovation", "our chosen future direction" – NOT EGO, PROFIT, and the unnatural structure of the bottom line.  

The Excuse, “I didn't know” energy evolution was a requirement for the survival of life is fading fast. 

Playing isolated pretend, disconnected from the real world, is no longer a valid business model. 

 

Polluted Paris chokes in the springtime sun

Air pollution in Paris has hit health-threatening levels over 80 percent higher than in London and Berlin as a sunny spell reaches western Europe, prompting the city to curb road speeds and offer free public transport.  http://local.msn.com/polluted-paris-chokes-in-the-springtime-sun

The current status quo of the repeating “next scientific revolution in energy” remains unchanged since my exploration, investigation and research began in the 1960s. This energy evolution minority status has not even achieved  the ‘100^th monkey syndrome’ level of support.  

The precarious scales supporting life are way off balance, and increasing exponentially.  Any suggestions? 

Only a systemic change, based upon scientific acknowledgement of Natural Laws, reinforced by extremely advanced, unlimited, yet common sense, energy systems, will counter balance the collective, self-imposed, negative, ever-growing threats to human survival currently in progress.

If anyone sees POSITIVE counter balances sufficient to correct the NEGATIVES in process (previous post) , please advise with in-depth factual data – shallow, disconnected, isolated, surface techniques will be ignored. The time for temporary – inefficient, insufficient patchwork has passed  (i.e., solar, wind, tidal, geo, bio….…or space elevators, umbrella’s for earth, etc). 

Exploring Energy Evolution

NEXT QUESTION: Light’s Curved Bombshell

Taking Einstein’s Light Beam Thought Experiment to the next levels

A trip from Earth to Alpha Centauri at four times the speed of light - a postulated thought experiment further revealing the necessity to introduce expanded variables when dealing with large scale variances.  

Additional reference points for the reader to consider regarding the previous post challenge “to do some critical thinking of the factors involved in the Chicago to New York trip at the velocity of light speed” full details): 

It is always NOW:

“If we continue to observe for several years, we will eventually see ourselves build the craft and take off into space. At the same time we can see ourselves in the same craft hurtling backward through space toward the inevitable meeting point where the past and the future join to become the present.

Since we are observing ourselves simultaneously occupying three different positions in space, we can readily see that we are forced to a concept of time which includes more than one dimension. If we continue to observe the two craft, we will see that the one which is moving away from us is constantly slowing down, while the one coming toward us from the earth is accelerating. At the instant in which the velocity of the receding craft reaches zero, the approaching craft will reach it, coincide with it, and both craft will disappear completely from view. Our lateral excursion into time has completed its curve and we have returned to the starting point of our unidimensional concept.”  full details

NEXT QUESTION: Light’s Curved Bombshell

Now to the next question: Describe the actions of the natural laws (space time mass matter energy gravity) when frequencies at VC or VC plus energy differentials are substituted for velocity between two or more specified reference points?

Recall: While we have repeatedly referred to the quantity C as an energy differential, we have heretofore considered it only in terms of kinetic energy. Some may believe that it can be reached only when there is a rate of increase or decrease in the degree of spatial separation between the reference points, equal to 3x10(10) centimeters per second, or in simpler terms, a velocity equal to that of light. It is necessary therefore to point out the fact that an energy differential does not necessarily manifest itself as a velocity. It can also exist as a frequency. Our present laws of physics state that the energy level upon which an electron, a photon, or other particle exists is proportionate to its frequency. The mathematical rule is E equals Fh, where E is the energy, F is the frequency and h is a factor called Planck's constant.

For Clueless:  http://www.fuel2000.net/clueless.swf

Space time: http://www.fuel2000.net/spacetime.swf  

Science — What’s Behind the Curtain?

TIME OUT - REALITY REVIEW
An excellent, thought provoking, and in depth look by Thrive at the foundational lenses through which we define our reality. Both the extreme danger and opportunity are obvious. Today, ignoring these issues is not an option.

Toward a thriving world,   Foster, Kimberly and The THRIVE Team

 thrivemovement.com  

Thrive

What determines scientific truth? It depends on which lens you are looking through.

Science — What’s Behind the Curtain?

Have you ever heard the phrase, you can’t argue with science? Well, what is that supposed to mean? What is science, and who determines what gets researched and what models of reality prevail?

VISION: A world where Science serves the thriving of all people, where human beings are open to the benefit of rigorous processes of inquiry with logic, research and testing while simultaneously honoring the role of consciousness and phenomena that stretch beyond the reach of the physical senses and the rational mind.

Danger : The genuine search for the truth about how nature works is increasingly co-opted by the vested interests of those who control the funding of research and patenting (such as corporations, politicians and the military), and the genuine pursuit of greater understanding about how the universe works and our place in it is superseded by the agenda of a controlling elite.

Opportunity : Research and development takes place in a truly free market of voluntary association and results that impact the public are transparent about the sources of their funding. Science is honored for its ability to discover how we can align our systems with natural principles and thrive together on a healthy planet.   More

Revisiting NASA’s "Is Warp Drive Possible?"

Revisiting:  NASA’s Wormhole Warp through curved space, back and forth through time – all nonexistent possibilities

http://www.33rdsquare.com/2013/06/is-warp-drive-possible.html

Is Warp Drive Possible?

NASA researchers have actually been testing actual faster-than-light warp drive practicality. By re-imagining of an Alcubierre Drive, it may eventually result in an engine that can transport a spacecraft to the nearest star in a matter of weeks — and all without violating Einstein's law of relativity.
Star Trek's warp drive may not be restricted to the world of science fiction after all.  A few months ago, physicist Harold White shocked the aeronautics world when he announced that he and his team at NASA had begun work on the development of a warp drive. His proposed design, an ingenious re-imagining of an Alcubierre Drive, may eventually result in an engine that can transport a spacecraft to the nearest star in a matter of weeks. Read more: http://www.33rdsquare.com/2013/06/is-warp-drive-possible.html#ixzz2u5lfkQG2 

The Alcubierre drive 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive The Alcubierre drive or Alcubierre metric (referring to metric tensor) is a speculative idea based on a solution of Einstein's field equations in general relativity as proposed by theoretical physicist Miguel Alcubierre, by which a spacecraft could achieve faster-than-light travel if a configurable energy-density field lower than that of vacuum (i.e. negative mass) could be created. Rather than exceeding the speed of light within its local frame of reference, a spacecraft would traverse distances by contracting space in front of it and expanding space behind it, resulting in effective faster-than-light travel.

Meet the NASA scientist devising a starship warp drive

“Two Loopholes to alter the properties of space and time”:

·        One is a wormhole

·        The other is a space warp

Non-programmed re-assessment of basic science fundamentals

Non-programmed re-assessment of basic science fundamentals, with critical, creative thought derived from self-discovery are now necessary to update, upgrade and revise physics’ standard model.   The stumbling blocks of “local frame of reference” across extreme scale variances, among all intertwined factors of nature (space-time-mass-matter-energy-gravity), without a common denominator, interjected with erroneously defined complex numbers and the square root of -1 ………………. will not go away using a ‘buggy whip’ tool (from horse and buggy days) to drive a starship.

Not to insult anyone’s intelligence, let us look at a very basic simple concept – going from Chicago to New York at three different speeds, to review and identify the factors in play.

In the walk and flight time sceniaros, distance only appears to have shortened, due to the far less time involved (2nd option), caused by the greater energy differential substituted for the time variable.

With this obvious clue (energy-time substitution) providing insight to the total interdependent relationships between space-time-mass-matter-energy-gravity, we will challenge the reader to do some critical thinking of the factors involved on the third option, Chgo to NY @ VC (velocity of light) speed.

Recognition of what you can or cannot SEE, by science’s  own definition of light, and the fact that the VC energy differential, the quantity C, is the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter will go a long ways toward clearing up wormholes, space and time curves and warps, black and white holes, and many other interferences, obstructions, blocking our expanding window to reality. 

Recall:  The Natural laws of space-time-mass-matter-energy-gravity are not absolute, but relative. That is, the size and shape of the curve of one law is dependent upon the value and position of the others - and /or - the value of one can be altered between any two reference points by altering the value or relationship of the other. In this example, we note time and energy’s relationship variance follows the same curve of natural law which is apparent in the operation of all the basic factors of nature, and again the radius of that curvature is measured by the quantity C.

The natural laws do not follow a straight line reaching to infinity, but a curve of finite radii. In a timeless universe, this curve, in any given plane, would be represented by a circle, but since the laws operate through time as well as space, the curve may be more readily understood if depicted as a "sine curve" or "wave". The "base" line of the wave (which is the center line of the curve) represents zero, and the portions above and below the line represent the positive and negative aspects of the law.  Thus we see that there are points and conditions in which the natural laws reach zero value with respect to a given reference point, and that beyond these points the laws become negative, reversing their effect with respect to the observer.

The "limitations of relativity" will always precede us at a distance equal to the radius of curvature of natural law. We need not fear that we will ever overtake or be hampered in any way by those limitations, since our 'reference point' (of a true coordinate system) will always go along with us. The value of the natural laws (gravitational field included) at any given point is controlled by the values of the other factors of nature at that point. 

Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law:

The Quantity C: Possessing a Significance Far Greater than Attributed

Gravity – As Viewed Through the Radius (VC)

Space as Observed through the Curve of Radius Light

Matter and Mass - Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass

Beyond A Uni-Dimensional Perception of TIME 

The Nonlinearity of Physical Law

Taking the “Flat World” Limited View Out of the Standard Model of Physics

96% "missing" "dark matter"

Currently, the Standard Model of physics accurately predicts only about 4% of our universe. The other 96% is "missing" and composed of "dark matter" and "dark energy". Perhaps what is missing is the incredibly abundant energy that exists within SPACE itself. It is missing from their equations because of something included in the standard model known as "renormalization" where they effectively swept the infinite density of the vacuum of space under the rug mathematically and then proceeded with their equations as if this energy were not important to include in a theory that is supposed to, by definition, include everything.

When the energy that exists in the vacuum of space itself is properly accounted for then the need to throw in this "missing new type of matter" that was invented out of thin air and added to the standard model to make the model work is no longer necessary. When including the incredible amount of energy present in the fabric of the vacuum itself, then one can calculate that the proton, for example, has enough mass-energy inside of it's volume to create a tiny singularity in its center: a mini black hole.

See Nassim Haramein's paper "The Schwarzschild proton" for the details of this theory that shows that only a very small percentage (~10-39%) of the vacuum fluctuations available within a proton volume need be cohered and converted to mass-energy in order for the proton to meet the Schwarzschild condition of a black hole.  The Schwarzschild proton paper .pdf :
http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/AIP_CP_SProton_Haramein.pdf

The disappearance act of ROC - radius of curvature of all natural law (1903-1904 E.T. Whittaker), hugely assisted by Heaveside and Gibbs, and subsequently swept under the rug by the continued use of the mathematical renormalization (clown?), helped create today’s contemporary standard model farce of modern physics. 

On A Testable Unification Of Electromagnetics, General Relativity, And Quantum Mechanics

T.E. Bearden
Association of Distinguished American Scientists
2311 Big Cove Road, Huntsville, Alabama 35801

Walter Rosenthal
4876 Bethany Lane, Santa Maria, California 93455

Copyright © 1991 by T.E. Bearden & W. Rosenthal, All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

Unrecognized for what it was, in 1903-1904 E.T. Whittaker (W) published a fundamental, engineerable theory of electrogravitation (EG) in two profound papers. The first (W-1903) demonstrated a hidden bidirectional EM wave structure in the scalar potential of vacuum, and showed how to produce a standing scalar EM potential wave -- the same wave discovered experimentally four years earlier by Nikola Tesla. W-1903 is a hidden variable theory that shows how to deterministically curve the local and/or distant space-time using EM. W-1904 shows that all force field EM can be replaced by interferometry of two scalar potentials, anticipating the Aharonov-Bohm effect by 55 years and extending it to the engineerable macroscopic world. W-1903 shows how to turn EM into G-potential, curve local and/or distant space-time, and directly engineer the virtual particle flux of vacuum. W-1904 shows how to turn G-potential and curvature of space-time back into force-field EM, even at a distance. The papers implement Sakharov's 1968 statement that gravitation is not a fundamental field of nature, but a conglomerate of other fields. Separately applied to electromagnetics (EM), quantum mechanics (QM), and general relativity (GR), an extended superset of each results. The three supersets are Whittaker-unified, so that a testable, engineerable, unified field theory is generated. EM, QM, and GR each contained a fundamental error that blocked unification, and these three errors are explained. The Schroedinger potential can also be structured and altered, indicating the direct engineering of physical quantum change. Recently Ignatovich has pointed out this hidden bidirectional EM wave structure in the Schroedinger potential, without referencing Whittaker's 1903 discovery of the basic effect. The potential for applying the new approach to explain the nature of mind and thought, and providing a laboratory-testable theory for them, is briefly noted and indicative major references cited. Some of the possible implications for physics and biology are pointed out.

Note the problems/issues regarding scale invariance always appear at extremely large and small scales – differentials approaching, at, and exceeding the equivalent of the QC, velocity of light energy differential 

Scale Invariance  Thomas E. Phipps, Jr. ... undertook both theoretical studies and various small-scale ... How legitimate is it to treat first-order invariance problems by second ... link here

This link is not authorized by Yahoo! If you would like to continue to this link's intended destination at your own risk, click here.    

The Farce of Modern Physics

Plasma physicist Eric Lerner says that although the standard model makes valid predictions within broad limits of accuracy, it has no practical application beyond justifying the construction of ever-larger particle accelerators http://www.davidpratt.info/farce.htm

Excerpts

·        Note the scale conditions when the flip goes from positive attraction to negative;  Note also, Heaveside preferred complex numbers and the square root of -1, rather than deal with the QC as the radius of curvature of all natural law.

·        The weak nuclear force is a very curious type of ‘force’. Many orders of magnitude weaker than the electromagnetic force, it is responsible for radioactivity and hydrogen fusion, and supposedly converts neutrons into protons by tampering with quarks. The strong nuclear force between neutrons and protons is also very peculiar. Up to a distance of around 10^-15 m (1 fermi), it is very strongly repulsive, keeping nucleons apart. Then, for unknown reasons, it abruptly becomes very strongly attractive, before dropping off very rapidly. Current theory claims that this somehow results from the inter-quark gluon force ‘leaking’ out of the nucleon. Obviously if quarks don’t exist no force is required to hold them together. As for the force holding protons and neutrons together, some alternative theories argue that there are no neutrons in the atomic nucleus, only positive and negative charges held together by ordinary electrostatic forces.¹⁰

·        ‘the Maxwell theory fails many experimental tests and has only a limited range of validity ... The fanatical belief in the validity of Maxwell’s theory for all situations, like the fanatical belief in “special relativity”, which is purported to be confirmed by the Maxwell theory, continues to hamper the progress in physics.’¹ Pioneering scientists and inventors Paulo and Alexandra Correa show that Maxwell’s fundamental errors included the wrong dimensional units for magnetic and electric fields and for current – ‘two epochal errors now reproduced for over a century, and which have done much to arrest the development of field theory’.²

·        Meanwhile, symmetry had been superseded by supersymmetry (or SUSY), which is rooted in the concept of spin. The basic idea is that matter particles (fermions) and force-carrier particles (bosons) are not really two different kinds of particles, but one. Each elementary fermion is assumed to have a boson superpartner with identical properties except for mass and spin. For each quark there is a squark, for each lepton a slepton, for each gluon a gluino, for each photon a photino, etc. In addition, for the bosonic Higgs field it is necessary to postulate a second set of Higgs fields with a second set of superpartners.

·        A major problem is that these new particles (known as ‘sparticles’) cannot have the same masses as the particles already known, otherwise they would have already been observed; they must be so heavy that they could not have been produced by current accelerators. This means that supersymmetry must be a spontaneously broken symmetry, and this is said to be a disaster for the supersymmetric project as it would require a vast array of new particles and forces on top of the new ones that come from supersymmetry itself. This completely destroys the ability of the theory to predict anything.

·        The reigning theory is that at the moment of the big bang the entire universe – including space itself – exploded into being out of nowhere in a random quantum fluctuation. Before it started to expand, it measured just 10^-33 cm across, and had infinite temperature and density. The main piece of evidence for this fairytale is that ‘space is expanding’. But no one has ever directly measured any expansion of space. The standard view is that space does not in fact expand within our own solar system or galaxy or within our local group of galaxies or even our own cluster of galaxies; instead, it only expands between clusters of galaxies – where, conveniently, there is no earthly chance of making any direct observations to confirm or refute it. Since space is surely infinite, how can it get any bigger?

·        As already mentioned, some physicists speak of a ‘quantum ether’. This refers to two things: 1) the zero-point field (ZPF), i.e. fluctuating electromagnetic radiation fields produced by random quantum fluctuations that, according to quantum theory, persist even at a temperature of absolute zero (-273°C); 2) innumerable pairs of short-lived ‘virtual’ particles (such as electrons and positrons), sometimes called the ‘Dirac sea’. Formally, every point of space should contain an infinite amount of zero-point energy. By assuming a minimum wavelength of electromagnetic vibrations, the energy density of the ‘quantum vacuum’ has been reduced to the still astronomical figure of 10¹⁰⁸ joules per cubic centimetre.

·        Although various experimental results are widely interpreted as consistent with the existence of zero-point energy, further work is needed to test the theory and alternative explanations. Some scientists have theorized that mass, inertia, and gravity are all connected with the fluctuating electromagnetic energy of the ZPF. However, the ZPF itself is usually regarded as the product of matter-energy, which supposedly originated in the ‘big bang’, whereas modern ether theories generally hold that physical matter crystallizes out of or dissolves back into the preexisting ether. At present the only verified all-pervasive electromagnetic energy field is the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is commonly hailed as the afterglow of the big bang, but is also explicable as the temperature of space, or rather of the ether.³

·        Paul LaViolette has developed a theory known as ‘subquantum kinetics’, which replaces the 19th-century concept of a mechanical, inert ether with that of a continuously transmuting ether.⁴ Physical subatomic particles and energy quanta are pictured as wavelike or vortex-like concentration patterns in the ether. A particle’s gravitational and electromagnetic fields are said to result from the fluxes of different kinds of etheric particles, or etherons, across their boundaries, and the associated etheron concentration gradients.

·        LaViolette believes that an etheric subatomic particle might resemble the vorticular structures that theosophists Annie Besant and Charles Leadbeater observed during their clairvoyant examination of atoms from 1895 to 1933. They called these objects ‘ultimate physical atoms’ (UPAs), which they considered to be the basic unit of physical matter, existing on the seventh and highest (‘atomic’) subplane of our physical plane; they said that any effort to dissociate a UPA further caused it to disappear from our own plane of reality.⁵

MOVING BACK TO NORMAL (BUT NOT RENORMALIZATION)

CONSIDERATION OF THE LARGER FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF LIGHT AND ITS RELATIVES: SPACE TIME MASS MATTER ENERGY GRAVITY/(FIELDS)

Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law:

·        Light: 186,000 miles per second (energy differential)

·        Light2: The Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law – a sine wave, positive/negative, characterizing the  nature of every natural law

·        Light3: The kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter

·        Light4: The Big Blink Inward - Gravitational, 186,000 per sec; Outward - Radiation, 186,000 per second

·        Light5:   Haramein / Rauscher’s (reference below) derivation that protons orbiting the nucleus of an atom at the speed of light in a vacuum are essentially a black hole

The Quantity C: Possessing a Significance Far Greater than Attributed, Gravity – As Viewed Through the Radius (VC) - Space as Observed through the Curve of Radius Light - Matter and Mass - Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass - Beyond A Uni-Dimensional Perception of TIME -The Nonlinearity of Physical Law, Schwarzschild radius of the Space Time Curve, Nassim Haramein "Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass

 

The Resonance Project

The universe has a fundamental structure (geometry) and a fundamental dynamic (spin). Here is an excellent image to show how these two fundamental principals interact. If you make two phi spirals out from a central point, each in opposite directions, their intersecting points outline the nodal points of a star tetrahedron, a geometry that is the seed of the fabric of the vacuum: an infinite

t etrahedral array. 

8 star-tetrahedrons put together creates a 64 tetrahedron grid, forming two octaves of what Buckminster Fuller called the "vector-equilibrium", otherwise known as the cube octahedron, that are nested inside each-other. 64 is fewest number of tetrahedrons you need to begin to see what is an infinite scalar fractal geometry that is the underlying geometric structure of the fabric of the entire universe.

The Resonance Project  ~ Nassim Haramein ~ Fractal Enlightenment