Energy Evolution Program

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Field Propulsion: the Universal Means for Producing Kinetic Energy Differentials








































The time is up for continuing the 700 year old rocket cartoon concept 





Here is how:

Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses 
Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  
The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:
....




Monday, January 18, 2016

About that ‘Time’…….and the subsequent distortions derived from a rudimentary definition

It is difficult to conceive our 21st century’s “new” prevailing view of time still allows for the possibility of actual travel to the past or to the future.

How does one do that in the ever-present blink of “NOW” everywhere?

The PAST is memory and can be seen only visually by the light between any two or more reference points, the variance becoming significant dependent upon distance. The light reaching us from our sun, stars, galaxies contains the past, distance dependent.  An instantaneous energy differential shift of position from our reference point on earth to the nearest star (Alpha Centauri - 4 light years) would put us in the same NOW of time from which we came. In the change of location, the energy of position offsets the gravitational loss and all laws of conservation are upheld and satisfied. Looking back at earth, we would see ourselves 4 years in the past, as yet only contemplating our trip. Our instantaneous trip back to the earth (from Alpha Centauri ref point) would APPEAR to take us to the future, but only takes us back to the same now from which we left. (pic example uses one year trip to α Cen)
























It is all about energy differentials which both space and time represent.

 The FUTURE resides only in our imagination. With sufficient data, subtle and creative forces and energy differentials in wavelike motion in the NOW, can be (and are) predicted to intersect (if not interfered with) to produce a future reality. We do this 1000’s of times daily, consciously and unconsciously by habit. Activation of forces with physical events create our future from simple getting to work on time, to weather prediction, placing satellites in orbit, to insufficient black hole data for even a definition. Where the force lines intersect, provided no intervening interference, we can predict a future event. (those with keener insight can visualize the scene with photo like properties.




















With everything VISUALLY DEPENDENT UPON LIGHT, AND ITS SPEED, we need to get past this new ‘flat earth’ narrow syndrome in science, and look at reality beyond the VC constant limit which remains an error of definition. We must clear our minds of the thought block produced by the assumption that the quantity C is a factor of absolute limit. We must realize that it is a limiting factor only with respect to two given reference points, and that it is perfectly possible to conceive of a series of consecutive reference points between each two of which a differential equal to the quantity C may exist. (see THE TIME PROBLEM:  Beyond A Uni-Dimensional Perception of TIME)


The following comprehensive documentary carrying the “buggy whip and the buggy” into our future – The True Nature Of Time - New Documentary 2015, showing old habits still weaving the tapestry of a limited reality, could become a new World Wonder of the meaning PETRIFIED.
























"But what, exactly, is time? Despite its familiarity, its ineffability has defied even the greatest thinkers. Over 1,600 years ago the philosopher Augustine of Hippo admitted defeat with words that still resonate: “If no-one asks me, I know what it is. If I wish to explain it to him who asks, I do not know.”

According to theoretical physicist Lee Smolin, the time has come to grapple with this ancient conundrum: “Understanding the nature of time is the single most important problem facing science,” he says. As one of the founders of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Ontario, Canada, which specialises in tackling fundamental questions in physics, Professor Smolin has spent more time pondering deep questions than most. So why does he think the nature of time is so important? Because, says Smolin, it is central to the success of attempts to understand reality itself.





















Sadly, escalating, contortions and convolutions, ad infinitum encompassing Time continue. 

Spacetime symmetries - Mass–energy equivalence ……………. A further alteration of this geometry, locally resembling the Minkowski universe, derives from the use of a four-dimensional continuum containing mass points. This continuum is also non-Euclidean, but it allows for the elimination of gravitation as a dynamical force and is used in Einstein’s general theory of relativity (1916). In this general theory, the continuum still consists of world points that may be identified, though non-uniquely, by coordinates. Corresponding to each world point is a coordinate system such that, within the small, local region containing it, the time of special relativity will be approximated. Any succession of these world points, denoting a particle trajectory or light ray path, is known as a world line, or geodesic. Maximum velocities relative to an observer are still defined as the world lines of light flashes, at the constant velocity c.

“If the time on the primary system appears to be contracted by 20% as previously illustrated:  for one of the non relativistic seconds compared to the relativistic one 4/5 of a second takes place as a contraction relative to our dimension; shouldn't the same observation take place in reverse for the case of making the observation from the side containing the compressed time? That is shouldn't the observer on the other side also see our time as 20% faster, since we see their time as being 20% slower? The whole issue might be resolved by saying a faulty argument has taken place. But when we do the math we find that the slower moving time will see our time as being 25% faster than theirs and these ratios do not seem equal. Perhaps then if the ratio of compression and expansion were made at the golden ratio, then they would be equal when viewed from opposite perspectives. Please take the time to view this short video that may explain this paradox. The Media Got The Math WRONG - The Golden Ratio https://youtu.be/Yughel1X4OU

Whereas the geodesics of a Minkowski continuum (without mass-point accelerations) are straight lines, those of a general relativistic, or Riemannian, universe containing local concentrations of mass are curved; and gravitational fields can be interpreted as manifestations of the space-time curvature. However, one can always find coordinate systems in which, locally, the gravitational field strength is nonexistent. Such a reference frame, affixed to a selected world point, would naturally be in free-fall acceleration near a concentrated mass. Only in this region is the concept well defined—i.e., in the neighbourhood of the world point, in a limited region of space, for a limited duration(Note: A LIMITED VIEW CAN PROVE THE WORLD IS FLAT)


All direction of force in Nature is spiral.














Walter Russell ‘Light does not travel … It reproduces itself’. ‘The speed of Light’ depends of the frequency and length of wave motion.   Time flows two ways, but the senses detect only the forward flow. Each wave is a two-way reflected extension of an equilibrium zero which we call a vibration…….
Walter Russell’s Concept of Light & Revolution Tied to The Radius of Curvature: Within each cube field is the curved universe of two way light illusion; and beyond, to the farthest reaches of space, is a repetition of illusion from wave field to wave field at the rate of 186,400 miles per second. That is the speed in which every action-reaction anywhere repeats itself everywhere. This illusion of motion gives rise to the belief that light “travels.”
Had profit not undermined common sense, not only would we comprehend time, but also ‘field propulsion’ the natural and universal means of producing kinetic energy differentials, destroying the debilitating prison confines of limits resulting from the amateurish interpretation of the constant C in E=MC2 ………….. and the continuous replication of a 700-year-old ‘rocket’ concept.

"J.P. Morgan got Lorentz to cripple the Heaviside equations so that the new EE (electrical engineering) concepts being taught in the universities would not ever contain free energy and over unity systems. This deliberate mutilation and crippling of electrical engineering is the real and single cause of our dependence on oil and of much of the pollution of our biosphere…The “High Cabal” – Churchill’s name for the secret consortium of elite families and organization we loosely refer to as the “control groups.” – has been ruthlessly suppressing free energy inventors for a century, including by direct assassination.  Having personally survived several such assassination attempts, I have experienced what I’m speaking of"
        – Tom Bearden, Inventor, Author, 
Energy from the Vacuum




Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses 
Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  
The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:
....
 
 

Friday, December 25, 2015

Falcon 9 - In Perspective

 Falcon 9 - In Perspective


 SpaceX Makes History with Successful Booster Return to Onshore Landing




What Part is still not understood about E=MC2?
Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses 
Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  
The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:
....








Sunday, December 20, 2015

Beyond Content Free Whimsy


Beyond Content Free Whimsy – The Whole Reality: Matter and Mind

Cern's potential new particle discovery is 'a total game changer'  We may continue to break matter down into tinier and tinier pieces at the large Hadron Collider (or its future, ever more powerful, innovative and costly designs) eventually approaching trillions of miniscule, ever smaller- at times larger, broken shards – each possessing a claim of ‘revolutionary new physics’ property ……….. until, some day, soon we hope, recognition dawns that it is just another smaller/larger broken piece of, as they say, “glass”.
Understanding and application of “field propulsion – the clean nuclear concept – as the natural and universal means of producing kinetic energy differentials” will not come from broken pieces, nor from worm holes, worms, and time warps….to name a few flimsy tangents of thought derived from a flawed, and incomplete foundation.  
Coordinate transformations, reference frames, (spatial and temporal), (or neither – superspace), nor speculative theories with more than four dimensions, such as string theory predict 10 or 26 dimensions, with M-theory predicting 11 dimensions …. all require conversions into a more fundamental (and common) denominator toward understanding and application of the more profound facets of Natural Law underlying - space time mass matter energy gravity (see ‘back to skipped fundamentals’ – end of this post).
Moreover, the duality ‘wave/particle’ issue and the mind/matter relationship can no longer be ignored, nor misdiagnosed, for comprehension, Understanding, to dawn to a new expanded physics possessing a larger common sense window to reality (Sir Roger Penrose video below) …… quite necessary for human survival. 
As Einstein stated, and science today is commencing to prove, matter and energy at their fundamental levels, are reduced to a frequency of vibration, intertwined with space, time, and fields, bounded by light, the quantity C, whose dominant nature is the yin yang, a sine wave analogy with a dimensional zero point, the pivotal point upon which the natural laws become manifest, the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  – the meeting point of mind, consciousness.
Spin, spintronics, magnetic resonance, electron-spin resonance, nuclear magnetic resonance all point to the necessity of a more integrated, a more fundamental viewing point.
IN OUR MINDS AND HEARTS, WE KNOW, “TRAVELS FASTER THAN LIGHT” ARE POSIBLE.
UNDERSTANDING IS A REQUIREMENT. Ignoring major parts of reality guarantees inability to arrive at the common sense to comprehend and apply the more profound aspects and possibilities necessary to human evolution and sustainable survival.
WE CAN MAKE THIS REAL.

IXS Enterprise
Warp Ship FULL
 
Following find continued interesting examples of intuitively knowing something is missing in the standard model with it's associated stagnant window to reality ...... and the almost desperate search for solutions from narrowly defined, inadequate, ‘earth is flat syndrome’, terms.
In the end, it's a matter of perspective, with naive realism on one side, backed by the immense apparatus of modern research and technology, and other-minded thinkers who see that this block of cheese has many holes in it. Every argument for calling humans a cosmic accident--and Cox presents many of them, can be countered by arguments that view the same facts through a different theory--Cox presents none of those. Knowledge is now  in a state where some like Cox believe that modern physics is marching ahead triumphantly while others see physics at a crossroads of turbulent, confused crisis. Even beyond the biggest questions posed in Human Universe, science has been forced to ask itself what is real and what is true--two issues that haven't been resolved since ancient times and have now returned to challenge us.
Hard-line scientists tend to think of consciousness merely as a byproduct of the central nervous system. In this point of view, consciousness is derived from the physical body. However, the actual human experience in the world fails to line up with this position. The average person sees their own co…more
Sir Roger Penrose’s viewpoint 








.

Shape Dynamics is a new theory of gravity which removes the notion of local relativistic time from the guiding principles of gravity in the universe. It is a very promising approach which has been shown to be equivalent to Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, without being embedded in time. It is inspired by adherence to Mach's Principle, which is violated by Einstein's theory.
 
  
The Primer Fields Part 1 The Electrical Universe
In this video series the currently accepted theories of physics and astrophysics are shaken to the core by a radical new theory of the fundamental forces in ...
youtu.be/9EPlyiW-xGI


Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses 
Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  
The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:
....








Monday, November 23, 2015

Cool Fusion Confusion - not Cold Fusion, pun intended

Is there a limit to how dense an object can be?

Is there a limit to how dense an object can be?  “….maybe there are no limits to density!”

Explaining a mysterious barrier to fusion known as the 'density limit'   .....
For more than 50 years physicists have puzzled over a daunting mystery: Why do tokamak plasmas spiral apart when reaching a certain maximum density and halt fusion reactions? This "density limit" serves as a barrier that prevents tokamaks from operating at peak efficiency, and understanding what sets this maximum density would speed the development of fusion as a safe, clean and abundant energy source. Recently, researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy's Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) have revisited an old idea: bubbles called magnetic islands.

Daring move for first US-China fusion team
by Staff Writers,  Washington DC (SPX) Nov 13, 2015.   The way to increase the power and efficiency of magnetic fusion energy may be to risk running the plasma - hotter than 100-million-degrees C - closer than ever to the wall...


Computers uncover mechanism that stabilizes plasma within tokamaks   A team of physicists led by Stephen Jardin of the U.S. Department of Energy's Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) has discovered a mechanism that prevents the electrical current flowing through fusion plasma from repeatedly peaking and crashing. This behavior is known as a "sawtooth cycle" and can cause instabilities within the plasma's core.

New Super H-mode regime could greatly increase fusion power   100 million degrees Centigrade. His surprising discovery was that a model called EPED predicted more than one type of edge region in tokamak plasmas, with the previously unknown Super H-mode among them.  Such regions are called "pedestals" because they serve as ledges in H-mode plasmas from which the pressure drops off sharply. The higher and wider the pedestal the greater the density and pressure, which together act like thermoses to contain the man-made plasma at more than 100 million degrees C.

Greenwald Limit

Fundamentally Speaking........ 
tokamaks 


  









































































Variables to the theoretical density limit suggest unification/integration, common denominators, with equivalent energy differential reference frame substitutions, allowing for measurement through the micro, meso, macro CURVE variations of space and time utilizing the sine wave curve of radius C positions between specified points.


NIF is also in the fusion fray
















One such study Density limit in a first principles model of a magnetized plasma in the Debye–Hu¨ckel approximation  appears to be taking a more integrated variable approach:  Lorentz force, Coulomb force, velocity, magnetic field, absolute temperature, kB the Boltzmann constant, the discrete nature of matter, the contribution of the ions, the boundary effects, and the inhomogeneities of the macroscopic quantities characterizing the plasma, such as temperature, magnetic field and density. More in general, one should consider relativistic effects (the constant C), i.e., the retardation of the fields, and thus emission of radiation.


Greenwald Limit    nG=Ipπa2
where nG is the density in 1020 m-3, Ip the plasma current in MA, and a the minor radius in m.
In tokamaks (and Reversed Field Pinches[2]), exceeding the Greenwald limit typically leads to a disruption, although sometimes the limit can be crossed without deleterious effects (especially with peaked density profiles). Stellarators can typically exceed the Greenwald limit by factors of 2 to 5, or more (replacing Ip by an equivalent current corresponding to the magnetic field).
The mechanism behind this phenomenological limit is not fully understood, but probably associated with edge gradient limits. Recently, an explanation based on the formation of magnetic islands was
However, for what concerns the analytical side of the problem, in order to produce more exact fits with the experimental data one should push the theory much more forward. First one should settle the problem of the contribution of the ions, and include sustainment in the model. Then one should consider the boundary effects, and the inhomogeneities of the macroscopic quantities characterizing the plasma, such as temperature, magnetic field and density. More in general, one should consider relativistic effects, i.e., the retardations of the fields, and thus emission of radiation. Furthermore, one should consider higher order perturbation effects, going beyond the Debye–Hu¨ckel approximation. Useful information on all these problems should also be obtained through numerical studies, along the lines for example of the recent work [42] on strongly coupled plasmas.
We will show that this leads to a theoretical electron density limit ne given by the law
ne = 3
B2 µ0mc2
, (1)
where B is the magnetic field, µ0 the vacuum permeability, c the speed of light and m the electron mass. Using ne = 1/a3 where a is the mean interelectron distance, relation (1) can also be put in the particularly expressive form
1 2µ0
B2a3 =
1 6
mc2 , (2)
according to which the transition from order to chaos occurs when the magnetic energy inside a cell of volume a3 = 1/ne just equals (apart from a factor 1/6) the electron rest energy mc2. We will show below that the theoretical formula (1) fits not too badly the phenomenological density limit for plasma collapses in a large set of fusion devices, and this suggests that the contributions of the ions, which we have here neglected, should be of the same order of magnitude as that of the electrons. This conjecture is supported by a further result, which will be published elsewhere (see [10] for the case of a smeared out background). Namely, one can discuss the stability properties of the equilibrium solutions of a neutral system of electrons and ions in a constant magnetic field, and one finds a bifurcation to an unstable solution, at a critical density which is the same as (1) apart from a factor of order one.

The Goal:

Figure 1 - Extreme ultraviolet imaging telescope image of the Sun.




The Sun (macro) is a massive atomic furnace that works by converting hydrogen into helium. Hydrogen is the lightest and most abundant element in the universe. It has one proton in its nucleus. Temperatures and densities in the centre of the Sun are so great, 1.5 million°C and around 200 billion atmospheres, that colliding hydrogen nuclei sometimes fuse into helium nuclei. The creation of each helium nucleus requires four hydrogen nuclei.

Figure 1 - Extreme ultraviolet imaging telescope image of the Sun.
From SOHO project (
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/)
One helium nucleus has 99.3% of the weight of four hydrogen nuclei. This excess 0.7% of hydrogen mass compared with helium mass is converted into energy. In perspective, the Sun converts 600 million tons of hydrogen into 596 million tons of helium every second. The extra 4 million tons is converted into energy - in this case radiation in the form of gamma rays.

Figure 2 - The fusion of four hydrogen nuclei to form one nuclei of helium.

Figure 2 - The fusion (micro) of four hydrogen nuclei to form one nuclei of helium.
You can imagine the enormity of the energy generated when you realise that, given Albert Einstein's famous equation E=MC2, the 4 million ton differential is multiplied by the speed of light, squared. This energy is so great that the Sun gives off 6200 watts of light from every square centimetre of its surface. Compare this to a 60-100 Watt domestic light globe. As far as we know, the Sun has been giving off this light steadily for the last 4.5 billion years, 

















========================================================


Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses 
Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  
The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:
....