Energy Evolution Program

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Antidotes to ‘This New Equation Could Unite The Two Biggest Theories in Physics’

Imagine if you will, from the following posted glimpses gaining a foothold towards a unified macro, meso, mirco, reality, (albeit each still burdened with their respective, but required, artificial, supporting descriptions such as black holes, wormholes, time tunnels, great attractors, dipole repellers….)  just imagine, being able to realize the common micro meso macro denominator, from a viewing point rather than separate ‘flat’ points of view, running throughout the scale-fractal invariance realities. The need for artificial constructs to explain reality would then become null, as the ‘flat’, current view of E=MC2 transforms into its 3D clarified version, and light, the quantity C, is seen as possessing a significance far greater than attributed.





This New Equation Could Unite The Two Biggest Theories in Physics

In theory, if you fell in one side of a wormhole, you’d appear on the other side almost instantaneously, even if it happened to be on the exact opposite side of the Universe. But wormholes aren’t just portals to another place in the Universe, they’re portals between two times in the Universe. Like Carl Sagan once said, “You might emerge somewhere else in space, some when-else in time.”










IN BRIEF
In a recent paper, a Stanford theoretical physicist develops a new equation, one which indicates that the key to finally connecting general relativity and quantum mechanics is found in bizarre spacetime tunnels called wormholes.
One of the most stubborn problems in physics today is the fact that our two best theories to explain the Universe – general relativity and quantum mechanics – function perfectly well on their own, but as soon as you try to combine them, the maths just doesn’t work out.
But a Stanford theoretical physicist has just come up with a new equation that suggests the key to finally connecting the two could be found in bizarre spacetime tunnels called wormholes.
The equation is deceptively simple: ER = EPR.
It’s not made up of numerical values, but instead represents the names of some key players in theoretical physics.
On the left side of the equation, the ER stands for Einstein and Nathan Rosen,and refers to a 1935 paper they wrote together describing wormholes, known technically as Einstein-Rosen bridges.
On the right side of the equation, EPR stands for Einstein, Rosen and Boris Podolsky, who co-wrote another paper that year describing quantum entanglement …… more



 “find gravity inside quantum mechanics.” 































Nassim Haramein's paper "The Schwarzschild Proton" presents a new solution for the mass of the proton giving a result that is much heavier than the one standard model predicts. While the standard proton has a mass 10 to the -24g, the proton that Nassim Haramein's equations describe have a mass of 10 to the 14g : a difference of 38 orders of magnitude.
The different measurements occur due to two different ways of measuring the mass of the proton. The standard model ignores the energy-density of the space itself that exists inside the atom through a mathematical trick called "renormalization", whereas Nassim Haramein appropriately accounts for the energy-density of the space itself inside the atom, giving it a much larger value.
The resulting mass shows that the proton itself obeys the Schwarzschild condition of a black hole and has enough mass to actually be considered a miniature black hole itself. The standard model is only accounting for the mass as observed from OUTSIDE the proton, whereas Nassim is accounting for the mass inside the proton which includes the mass dilation that occurs INSIDE the event horizon of the mini black hole. Mass increases exponentially if it is spinning at a rate that approaches the speed of light inside the event horizon of any black hole (black whole).
When you place both proton measurements into a graph and compare the proton mass vs. the proton radius along with many other known objects in the universe, a linear relationship of mass vs. radius pattern arises. The Schwarzschild proton fits in perfect alignment with all other objects on all scales in it's relationship of mass vs. radius, whereas the standard model proton falls way off the graph. The proton, the sun and the galaxy are all centered by various scale black holes, all centered by singularity.
Everything in the universe is centered by stillness. Space-time curls like water going down the drain to the singularity in the center of black holes on all scales in the infinite scalar tetrahedral geometry of fabric of the vacuum...
For more details, see the "The Schwarzschild Proton" paper and "Scale unification: a universal scaling law" paper themselves:
http://hiup.org/publications/




















Until now, scientists assumed that a dense region of the universe is pulling us toward it, in the same way that gravity made Newton’s apple fall to earth. The initial “prime suspect” was called the Great Attractor, a region of a half dozen rich clusters of galaxies 150 million lightyears from the Milky Way. Soon after, attention was drawn to an area of more than two dozen rich clusters, called the Shapley Concentration, which sits 600 million lightyears beyond the Great Attractor.
Now researchers led by Prof. Yehuda Hoffman at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem report that our galaxy is not only being pulled, but also pushed. In a new study in the forthcoming issue of Nature Astronomy, they describe a previously unknown, very large region in our extragalactic neighborhood. Largely devoid of galaxies, this void exerts a repelling force on our Local Group of galaxies.
“By 3-d mapping the flow of galaxies through space, we found that our Milky Way galaxy is speeding away from a large, previously unidentified region of low density. Because it repels rather than attracts, we call this region the Dipole Repeller,” said Prof. Yehuda Hoffman. “In addition to being pulled towards the known Shapley Concentration, we are also being pushed away from the newly discovered Dipole Repeller. Thus it has become apparent that push and pull are of comparable importance at our location.”











Putting it all together



The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

The 2D Science Hangup: Science Still Functions in 3 Vastly Different Worlds - Micro, Meso, Macro

Regards non coherence with total silence on previous post....
 "Common sense might dictate that for an object to move from one point to another, it must go through all the points on the path. Not so for electrons in the quantum world, which don't follow such common-sense rules for the most part. Electrons can show up on the first floor, then the third floor, without ever having been on the second floor," Zhao said.

..... let's look deeper at what may be causing science to stagnate in a 2D (flat world) view of their 3 separate universes, the micro, meso, and macro, preventing common sense to penetrate the fog of disconnection to permit clear understanding of such applications as "movement/transport from one point to another without going through all points in between'. 

Brief view of current and very elementary approaches to the micro, meso, macro views:

On Three Levels: Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-Approaches in Physics 
Living in a Quantum World
Complex systems

The simple translation of physics' (2 Dimensional) Standard Model and (2 Dimensional) equation description of E=MC2 into a 3D view is as follows:

The non-linearity of physical law runs through all three levels - micro - macro - meso
Required - The Common Denominator for space time mass matter energy gravity - in frequency. (any change to one of the natural laws causes a corresponding change to the others - these natural laws are totally, completely interrelated - NONE, space time mass matter energy gravity stand independent)

Science today has the resources to test (and retest previous classified attempts) for the 3 D version of E=mc2, identifying C (light) as the Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law.

World View 101: National Ignition Facility, Crystals


Sunday, March 19, 2017

Counterintuitive Motion of Electrons Bypassing the 'All Points in Between' requirement

More on the confused topics of 'action at a distance', 'simultaneity', 'quantum entanglement', and 'movement from one point to another without going through all points in between'.

 "Common sense might dictate that for an object to move from one point to another, it must go through all the points on the path. Not so for electrons in the quantum world, which don't follow such common-sense rules for the most part. Electrons can show up on the first floor, then the third floor, without ever having been on the second floor," Zhao said.

Illustration of laser beam triggering quantum movement of electrons between top and bottom layers, bypassing middle layer. The new tri-layer material from KU's Ultrafast Laser Lab material someday could lead to next-generation electronics. Image courtesy Frank Ceballos and University of Kansas.


Quantum movement of electrons in atomic layers shows potential of materials for electronics and photonics
by Staff WritersLawrence KS (SPX) Mar 17, 2017

.............................................

The creation of 'border walls', AKA continued dissection, separation, and isolation of the micro, meso, and macro scientific realms, without periodic integration will sustain the confusion in 'entanglement', black hole, wormhole, etc., theories, while keeping scientific advancement on a short trivia stick, as major advancements in energy evolution - from medical research to propulsion systems - remain dormant.

Contemporary status summary on 'entanglement':
NIST team proves 'spooky action at a distance' is really real
Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance


The road to integration of the micro, meso, macro realms mandates a larger view of light, the quantity C, in E=MC2

Summation of Fundamental Principle VC:

•        The quantity C (velocity of light) is the radius of curvature of all natural law, the pivotal point upon which the natural laws become manifest, the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter.
•        The Quantity C is the radius of curvature of all natural law, meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.
•        While we have repeatedly referred to the quantity C as an energy differential, we have heretofore considered it only in terms of kinetic energy. Some may believe that it can be reached only when there is a rate of increase or decrease in the degree of spatial separation between the reference points, equal to 3x10(10) centimeters per second, or in simpler terms, a velocity equal to that of light. It is necessary therefore to point out the fact that an energy differential does not necessarily manifest itself as a velocity. It can also exist as a frequency. Our present laws of physics state that the energy level upon which an electron, a photon, or other particle exists is proportionate to its frequency. The mathematical rule is E equals Fh, where E is the energy, F is the frequency and h is a factor called Planck's constant.
 We can now see that a frequency differential which by the above formula is equal to 9x10(20) ergs per gram also represents the quantity C. When such a frequency differential exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, we again find that the natural laws at the observed point reach zero value with respect to the observer. If the frequency differential exceeds this value, the action of the laws will become negative. A material object such as a spacecraft upon or near the surface of the earth would cease to exist as matter and would enter the plane of energy insofar as the observer on earth was concerned, but as we have previously pointed out, an observer upon or within the object, whose frequency or energy level had been raised to the same degree as that of the craft, would be unable to detect any change.
 We must clear our minds of the thought block produced by the assumption that the quantity C is a factor of absolute limit. We must realize that it is a limiting factor only with respect to two given reference points, and that it is perfectly possible to conceive of a series of consecutive reference points between each two of which a differential equal to the quantity C may exist.
•        The simple unity of matter and energy: Consider a geometric plane surface having two dimensions. If this plane is perpendicular to your line of sight you perceive it as a plane surface, the matter aspect. If now you rotate the plane through an angle of ninety degrees, the surface will disappear from your sight, leaving only one dimension, the energy aspect. You have not changed the plane in any way. You have merely changed your point of view, or technically, you have changed your point of reference. The amount of energy which is apparently contained by a given body of matter depends entirely upon how far it has rotated upon the mass energy axis (defined by the quantity C, the radius of curvature of all natural law) with respect to the given observer. Another observer, observing the same body from a different reference point, would find an entirely different amount of energy.
•        ENERGY: We will define energy as the ability to create changes in the position or condition of objects or points of reference. However, energy can create change, only when there exists a differential in the two points between which the change becomes manifest, or when the unit of energy has become divided into its two component parts called poles, or charges. One positive and one negative pole or charge, when united, constitute one photon or quantum of energy. (see definitions  of the natural laws: space time mass matter energy gravity)

We have the resources to test (and retest previous classified attempts) the 3 D version of E=mc2, identifying C as the Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law.

World View 101: National Ignition Facility, Crystals




Sunday, January 15, 2017

Time: Edging Closer to Real

The closer one approaches the moment of Now ...... reality takes on the splendor of pure creation.

 There Is No Time. There Never Was And There Never Will Be 

As we edge closer to real on the 'time' perspective, surmised in the above article, and in this blog's previously discussed posts (About Time,  About That Time, or Lee Smolin's Time Reborn), opening doors to erroneously believed limits, we can find all the mysteries dissolve with a 3D version of E=MC2, acknowledging the constant C (light) as the Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law.

















Everything exists in the present moment and it’s a fundamental principle of the Universe that many of our scientists are still trying to grasp. Time does not actually exist and Quantum Theory proves it. There are things that are closer to you in time, and things that are further away, just as there are things that are near or far away in space. But the idea that time flows past you is just as absurd as the suggestion that space does.

The trouble with time started a century ago, when Einstein’s special and general theories of relativity demolished the idea of time as a universal constant. One consequence is that the past, present, and future are not absolutes. Einstein’s theories also opened a rift in physics because the rules of general relativity (which describe gravity and the large-scale structure of the cosmos) seem incompatible with those of quantum physics (which govern the realm of the tiny).

According to Einstein’s special theory of relativity, there is no way to specify events that everyone can agree happen simultaneously. Two events that are both “now” to you will happen at different times for anyone moving at another speed. Other people will see a different now that might contain elements of yours รข€“ but equally might not.

The result is a picture known as the block universe: the universe seen from that impossible vantage point outside space and time. You can by all means mark what you think is “now” with a red dot, but there is nothing that distinguishes that place from any other, except that you are there. Past and future are no more physically distinguished than left and right..... more


Dissolving the Mysteries




The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Dare We Inquire What is Beyond Our Field of Vision?

Dare We Inquire What is Beyond Our Field of Vision? 

I Wonder Why: Why is light, the quantity C, the exact kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter? Your answer is the portal to the 3 D version of E=MC2, using the common denominator of frequency/vibration.

I noticed a post on LinkedIn today,  Energy Technologies, the year that was and will be , how stagnation in the 'new' energy field still runs the course.

And it certainly will, until a couple of simple issues, running counter to existing profit modules, are addressed. The longer the following simple concepts are ignored, the more foolish science will appear upon soon to arrive applications of FTL, antigravity, and entanglement options, such as, when appropriately deciphered,  "movement from one point to another, without going through all points in between", & etc. (easily noted, concepts requiring a 3D version of E=MC2 which enlarges and integrates our primitive concepts of space and time.)   

 One truly must rethink the early, antiquated, and massively erroneous interpretations of supposed effects between two reference points whose energy differentials approach, reach and exceed VC. The statements ‘As one’s mass becomes infinite, shortens in length, travels backwards in time, etc., etc. really requires a far more adult like explanation. There is more than meets the eye, when the light (which equates to the energy equivalent of matter),  is observed between any two specified reference points whose energy differential approaches, reaches and exceeds the VC differential. (Soon we will find the contemporary explanations, uttered with extreme confidence, to become the biggest joke science ever believed -  Ask a Mathematician / Ask a Physicist  Q: What would you experience if you were going the speed of light?)

The theory of relativity does not say that man cannot travel faster than the speed of light, it merely says that no one on earth can see it. The quantity C is not a factor of absolute limit. It is a limiting factor only with respect to two given reference points, and it is perfectly possible to conceive of a series of consecutive reference points between each two of which a differential equal to the quantity C may exist. This fact becomes obvious in situations where a differential of C, the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter, exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws are recognized as suspended; or when the energy differential is in excess of C, the laws operate in reverse at that point. THIS SIMPLE CONCEPT MUST BE ADDRESSED AND ACKNOWLEDGED, TO PERMIT FURTHER ADVANCES  IN ENERGY EVOLUTION.

RUNNING FROM FUNDAMENTAL REALITY SHOULD NOT BE THE NATURE OF MODERN SCIENCE. THE NATURAL LAWS ARE CURVED, NOT THE SPACE. Silence or ignoring the larger version of natural laws effect at C, and beyond C, between any two reference points, no longer suffices as a solution.

Imagine had we limited reality to our ears and the sound barrier.  In the same way, our field of vision, which depends upon the definition of light, should not limit reality to light speed between any two reference points. We do have other senses beyond the initial five to scientifically inquire into the nature of reality..... mathematics, imagination, intuition, merging mirco, meso, macro discoveries, along with advanced technologies which greatly extend our senses ...... all which concisely lead toward the above clearer relationship between matter and light. 

Revisit the skipped fundamentals (bottom of post), presenting a 3d version of E=MC2, and note how the Nature of Reality, and our views of space, time, and gravity also greatly expands. 


Hopefully, some of these fine institutions will eventually ask the question.














Welcome inside the Perimeter

There’s a universe of ideas to explore – from quantum to cosmos – at InsideThePerimeter.ca.






Monday, December 26, 2016

Where Can’t Doesn’t Fly – How a Beautiful Construct Unintentionally Can Incarcerate Future Possibilities

Where Can’t Doesn’t Fly






























 IMPRESSIVE!  Catalyzes hope and excitement for the future, until one looks at the outdated fundamentals. These can be impairing.


  •  IMPLANTING FUTURE IDEAS WITH OLD, STALE, FUNDAMENTALS
  •  SOLIDIFIED BY STALE BELIEFS AND SHUT OFF AWARENESS POTENTIAL 
  •  CREATING UNWANTED ‘BUGGY WHIP’ GOODS WITH CRIPPLED, SEVERELY  LIMITED POSSIBILITIES
  •   REINFORCED AND SUPPORTED BY THE CREATION OF PHYSICAL  CONSTRAINTS –   as likened to horse and buggy speeds


While the intention deserves significant applause, one will note, lack of awareness can impede and eventually crush good intentions AND the future. Imagine if one still believed one lived on a flat earth with no concept of a third dimension.


Where in all this is found ‘field propulsion’, the universal and natural means of producing kinetic energy differentials?

Where are the simple means of producing antigravity applications, as observed in both the macro and micro realms?

When will transport of goods from one point to another be accomplished, without going through all points in between, i.e., transmuting space and time?

When will comprehension dawn on the immense power in a tiny, tiny atom with simple, non-radioactive extraction possibilities?

This list is endless, with boundless opportunities and no limits. Renders killing for oil, or not enough to go around, rather meaningless.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: UPGRADE THE FUNDAMENTALS – MOVE FROM A LIMITED 2D VERSION OF E=MC2 TO ONE COMPARABLE TO A 3D VERSION








The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:

Friday, November 25, 2016

A Tale of the Flat, 2D Stalemated Version of E=MC2 with non-variable light speed

A physics question: To USE crutches and invent artificial (non-existent) foundational bridges to support flawed and misinterpreted theory, OR NOT? With a 3D view of E=MC2, artificial addons are not required to better understand reality.

Good to know: any number of observations, if made on a sufficiently limited scale, will tend to indicate that the earth is flat, rather than spherical.


A theory by Imperial physicists that the speed of light is variable - and not constant as Einstein suggested - could soon be put to the test.  






The testability of the varying speed of light theory sets it apart from the more mainstream rival theory: inflation. Inflation says that the early universe went through an extremely rapid expansion phase, much faster than the current rate of expansion of the universe. These theories are necessary to overcome what physicists call the 'horizon problem'. The universe as we see it today appears to be everywhere broadly the same, for example it has a relatively homogenous density.

A clearer, "more real" view using a refined, broader, 3D version of E=mc2 
Through the concept of the curvature of physical law, however, we see that the addition of mass to an existing body does not, necessarily, increase the force of attraction between its parts, but may, under certain conditions, cause the field to become negative, and the attraction to become a repulsion. We can explain the observed actions of the present universe by postulating that an attraction exists between the individual bodies within a galaxy, because their total mass and distance is such that they are within the positive portion of the gravitation curve with respect to each other. In the vast spaces between the galaxies however, the curve dips below the zero line with the result that a repulsion exists between the galaxies themselves.  This also explains why matter, although rather evenly distributed throughout the known universe, is not distributed uniformly, but found in quite similar concentrations at comparatively regular distances.

This could only be true if all regions of the universe were able to influence each other. However, if the speed of light has always been the same, then not enough time has passed for light to have travelled to the edge of the universe, and 'even out' the energy.

The alternative theory is inflation, which attempts to solve this problem by saying that the very early universe evened out while incredibly small, and then suddenly expanded, with the uniformity already imprinted on it. While this means the speed of light and the other laws of physics as we know them are preserved, it requires the invention of an 'inflation field' -- a set of conditions that only existed at the time.

















Light doesn't always travel at the speed of light. A new experiment reveals that focusing or manipulating the structure of light pulses reduces their speed, even in vacuum conditions. Generally if light is not traveling at c it is because it is moving through a material. For example, light slows down when passing through glass or water.

A clearer, "more real" view using a refined, broader, 3D version of E=mc2 
The quantity C is considered to be a constant, in fact the only constant which has survived in a relativistic world. In almost every text book on physics in the world today the statement is made that the quantity C represents the velocity of light (in centimeters per second), yet every student in the world who has studied the subject, knows that the velocity of light is not a constant. That its velocity, in fact, varies slightly with each different medium through which it is propagated. There are many who will dispute the statement that the change in velocity varies with the frequency, but when sufficiently precise tests are made entirely within a single medium, the results indicate convincingly that this is true. 

Fortunately there is a value to which the quantity C can be assigned which is a constant. Moreover the assignment of the quantity C to this factor makes possible a much better understanding of the natural laws involved in the propagation of energy. The quantity C is actually the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter. In other words, if we take a gram (or any other quantity of matter: Newtonian mass) and convert that matter gradually into energy according to the formula E = MC2, and the resultant energy, as it appeared, were constantly applied to the remaining matter in such a way as to accelerate it uniformly in a given direction, when all the matter had been so converted we would find that we had zero Newtonian mass, infinite inertial mass and a resultant velocity equal to the quantity C, or approximately 3x10(10) centimeters per second (with respect to the given reference or starting point). The maximum velocity attained would always be the same regardless of the quantity of matter with which we started.



















Now, in a paper to be published 28 November in Physical Review, he and Niayesh Afshordi at the Perimeter Institute in Canada have laid out a new version of the idea – and this one is testable. They suggest that in the early universe, light and gravity propagated at different speeds.
If photons moved faster than gravity just after the big bang, that would have let them get far enough for the universe to reach an equilibrium temperature much more quickly, the team say.
A testable theory
What really excites Magueijo about the idea is that it makes a specific prediction about the cosmic microwave background (CMB). This radiation, which fills the universe, was created shortly after the big bang and contains a “fossilised” imprint of the conditions of the universe.

 

Once grounded in REAL, desperate attempts to support current flawed theory with offbeat, tangential artificial mathematical structures will cease to contribute and reinforce outdated confusion.



OF NOTE:  A paper published in The European Physical Journal H provides the first English translation and an analysis of one of Albert Einstein's little-known papers, "On the cosmological problem of the general theory of relativity." Published in 1931, it features a forgotten model of the universe, while refuting Einstein's own earlier static model of 1917. In this paper, Einstein introduces a cosmic model in which the universe undergoes an expansion followed by a contraction. A more coherent theory – see http://resonance.is/ 


In Summary: 

…… the quantity C (velocity of light) as the radius of curvature of all natural law, the pivotal point upon which the natural laws become manifest, the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter. Meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  
Field propulsion and antigravity become common sense, teleportation/quantum entanglement demystify, and erroneous limits dissolve, permitting application throughout the macro, meso, micro frames.
 …… We must clear our minds of the thought block produced by the assumption that the quantity C is a factor of absolute limit. We must realize that it is a limiting factor only with respect to two given reference points, and that it is perfectly possible to conceive of a series of consecutive reference points between each two of which a differential equal to the quantity C may exist.

…… The quantity C is the factor which will enable us to determine precisely the degree of change in the curvature of one law which will be brought about by a specified change in the application of the others.

 It is the factor which will eventually tell us how to place our spacecraft in either the positive or negative portion of the gravitational curve with respect to the earth or any other planet which we may choose to visit.

Towards more refined, jaw-dropping, seemingly miraculous, nuclear applications using frequencies and fields.

















The '3D' Version of E=mc2 




The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory: