Back to square one – get the expanded version of E=MC2 - it is child-like simple, surmised in the following link: http://theempowermentfactor.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/the-next-scientific-revolution-intensive/
=======================================================
More on: Quantum weirdness: The battle for the
basis of reality
Reality,
relativity, causality or free will? Take quantum theory at face value and at
least one of them is an illusion – but which, asks Michael Brooks
Read more
Read more
http://www.newscientist.com/?cmpid=EMP|NSNS|2013-0708-GLOBAL-070813_ussarlacc_savings&utm_medium=EMP&utm_source=NSNS&utm_campaign=070813_ussarlacc_savings
MAY 28, 2013
The Progression of Time: Scale Expanding Cosmos links
General Relativity, Quantum Theory
In a recently published book titled "The Progression of Time
- How the expansion of space and time forms our world and powers the
universe", C. Johan Masreliez, a retired Engineer passionate about physics
and cosmology, introduces the concept of a fifth dimension beyond
four-dimensional spacetime.
The Scale Expanding Cosmos
(SEC) model overcomes some serious limitations of the Standard Cosmological
Model. It eliminates the need for a Big Bang creation-out-of-nothing event at
the beginning of the universe that is making today's cosmology little more than
an article of faith. It explains what motion is and how time progresses.
Inertia becomes understandable, being modeled in the SEC theory as a curvature
of the 4-dimensional space-time continuum, in a manner very similar to how
Einstein describes gravity in his General Theory of Relativity. dimensional space-time continuum, in a
manner very similar to how Einstein describes gravity in his General Theory of Relativity.
You can find the book on Amazon at www.amazon.com/Progression-Time-expansion-powers-universe/dp/1456574345/
The dynamically expanding scale dimension explains the seemingly
endless energy supply of the universe, saving us from gradual decline into an
ignominious heat death. It also resolves several of the paradoxes of Einstein's
Special Relativity and provides a stable cosmic frame of reference, something
Einstein could never quite get to grips with, in addition to allowing Quantum
Theory to be derived from the equations of General Relativity.
Quite a revolution in our understanding of the universe, the new
model might have a hard time gaining acceptance by physicists, but it is an
important step in advancing our understanding of the mechanics of the things
physics is supposed to explain.
MARCH 20,
2013
Beyond Relativity and Quantum Theories - Paramahamsa
Tewari's Vortex Universe
Paramahamsa Tewari, an Indian nuclear engineer and energy
researcher, is also the originator of Space Vortex Theory, a theory that posits
matter as based on two fundamental particles, the electron and the positron.
His website is www.tewari.org
According to Tewari, the universe is filled with an incompressible
super fluid. Fundamental particles are vortices that create a tiny spherical
void, where circulation at the limiting velocity of light leads to a breakdown
of the fluid's integrity. The discontinuity at the void/liquid interface
defines the particle boundary. Tension in the external fluid created by the
central void gives rise to gravity, while the tangential circulation of the
fluid at the interface is the cause of electric field phenomena.
Einstein's Relativity and Quantum theory have failed to develop a
conceptual view of the universe and of the matter we perceive. So in this
recent piece, Tewari says that mainstream physics should re-evaluate some of
its 'certainties'. The super fluid that fills space - the term was coined by
Tewari in 1974, only to be hijacked by others a few years later - is
precariously balanced at the edge of rotation, of vortexial motion. The
dynamics of this liquid explain the existence of both particles of matter and
fields in a way that is intuitive and visual. But let's see what Tewari has to
say...
To the adherents of Relativity and Quantum theories
If the universe cannot be described through your theories with
clear-cut physical pictures that a lay man can understand, the following may
set you thinking as to where your concepts went wrong. This departs radically
from your 20th century concepts that need deep revision. You held the field and
had your say for more than a century now and have led science to the games of
probability and uncertainty, of mere chance and coincidences, based on outer
appearances rather than the underlying reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment