Energy Evolution Program

Friday, April 18, 2014

Dissolving the limitations of a mind set: Perfectly possible to produce a negative gravitational field

It is perfectly possible to produce a negative gravitational field between the earth and a given object on or near its surface by the proper application of moving electric charges. Such a field would be effective only with respect to the given object. All other matter in the vicinity would remain within the positive portion of the curve. 

Dissolving the limitations of a mind set

Recap to date: Vacuum energy and the Radius of Curvature VC

As can be seen, the Cosmology video clearly identifies contemporary mis-interpretations of reference frames and insinuates the infinite energy in the vacuum of space is always with us to use.

Chapter 3: Faster-than-light Relativity of an Interstellar Traveler

In Episode 2 I argued for a universe infinite in space and time. Even if that is true, we can’t have our Star Trek universe if it takes millions of years to cross the galaxy. The Theory of Relativity was developed on the tiny planet Earth. It depends on, assumes that, nothing can go faster than the speed of light. Ask: with respect to what? See if the above video opens your mind to faster-than-light travel.

Vacuum Energy: Proof of Free Energy in the Space All Around Us    

 A new article on the limitless energy contained within the vacuum of space has been published by Waking Times referencing the work ofNassim Haramein and The Resonance Project Foundation. Entitled "Vacuum Energy: Proof of Free Energy in the Space All Around Us", the article does a good job describing the vacuum energy and its importance in physics while describing the fundamental principals behind Nassim Haramein's unified field theory.

Infinite Vacuum Energy in Quantum Physics

This is not a fringe theory. This is fundamental to the accepted physics paradigms of quantum theory which deal specifically with the level of the universe where all things are energy, or at least where they oscillate between energy and form. As quoted in one of the most fundamental physics textbooks, Gravitation, by three of the most highly influential physicists of the 20th Century, Charles Misner, Kip Thorne, and John Archibald Wheeler:

“…present day quantum field theory “gets rid by a renormalization process” of an energy density in the vacuum that would formerly be infinite if not removed by this renormalization.” (Gravitation, p.426)

In other words, they accept that the vacuum structure – allegedly empty space – is infinitely dense, but instead of dealing with infinity directly they attempt to renormalize this value. On the one hand it is logical to attempt to renormalize infinity, because after all, it is easier to plug a definite number into an equation than it is to use infinity. But on the other hand, in the world outside of mathematics, to not accept the infinite density of vacuum energy is to avoid a truthful perceptual experience and understanding of reality. On the topic of renormalization, Nassim Haramein can add to this conversation:

“To understand this [the infinite energy density of the vacuum] better, physicists applied a principle of “renormalisation”, using a fundamental constant to cut off the number and get a finite idea of how dense the vacuum energy must be, with all its vibrations. The cut-off value used was the Planck’s distance or length, named after the great physicist Max Planck, who is considered to be the founder of quantum theory. This value is thought to be the smallest vibration possible.” (To Infinity and Beyond: Transcending Our Limitations by Nassim Haramein)

The irony of the situation is that when they tried to renormalize the “energy density in the vacuum that would formerly be infinite” they came up with a value that was not much better. Using the Planck’s distance they decided to calculate the vacuum energy density by counting the number of Planck’s distances they could fit into a centimeter cube of space by stacking them like subatomic bricks, fitting as many as possible into that area.

Then they calculated the total amount of energy that was available in that space by multiplying the energy of a single Planck’s distance with the total number of Planck’s distances they packed into that centimeter cubed of space so that they could have a definite value for the density of vacuum energy (and remember, all of this is being done in order to get a value that wasn’t infinite).

The resulting “renormalized” value that they got for the vacuum energy density was 10^93 grams per centimeter cube of space. That is 10 with 93 zeroes after it, an enormous number. But to put the true enormity of this number in perspective, if the entire known universe was compacted into a centimeter cube of space, it would only reach a density of 10^55 grams/centimeter cubed! In other words, the renormalized density for vacuum energy exceeds the mass of the entire known universe … compacted into a centimeter cubed of space (from Crossing The Event Horizon).

Nassim continues:

“The vacuum energy density, or what can be called a Planck’s density, was in the order of 10^93 grams per cubic centimeter of space and was quickly dubbed ‘the worst prediction physics has ever made’ or ‘the vacuum catastrophe’.” (To Infinity and Beyond by Nassim Haramein)
The Casimir Effect

The existence of vacuum energy has also been verified by the Casimir Effect. In 1948, Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir devised a test that would either prove or disprove the existence of vacuum energy.

He theorized that if you could put two extremely thin metal plates together at an absurdly small distance from one another (we are taking about a distance of mere microns apart), then if there was vacuum energy you would create an imbalance within vacuum energy (or ‘an imbalance in the quantum fluctuations‘ as vacuum energy is more technically called) that would exert a force on the plates.

By putting these metal plates so close together you would have isolated all but the smallest wavelengths within the vacuum thus creating pressure on the outside of the plates which would have pushed them together, proving the existence of vacuum energy.

In 1948 when Hendrik Casimir came up with this idea the technology was not around to test his theory. But a few decades later scientists where able to carry out this experiment and prove conclusively that Hendrik Casimir was correct, and that there is an energy density to the vacuum. Since then this experiment has been validated many times by many scientists, and it has become known as ‘The Casimir Effect’. This is conclusive and undeniable proof of the existence of vacuum energy which is free energy.

(For more information on the Casimir Effect and on Free Energy check out this great article: Multiple Scientists Confirm the Existence of Free Energy)
Conclusion – Moving Forwards

We are swimming within an infinitely dense sea of energy. It has been proven not only that everything is energy, but also that each and every centimeter cube of space contains infinite energy. If we used our resources as individual nations and as a planet searching for ways to tap into this energy, instead of suppressing new research that has already done so, then in a few short years we could be powering our planet with free vacuum energy extracted directly from the structure of space-time.

No more oil. No more pollution. No more wars over energy. No more needing to work to heat our homes. We could all quite our jobs and have unlimited free time to pursue our passions and contribute our knowledge and creativity to society. We would have time to build gardens that maintain themselves, and collectively produce natural food to feed our planet while we spend our days in nature, following our passions, and doing what we love to do.

By tapping into vacuum energy with our technology and with perception, we can change the world.
Spread the word.

We were all taught that space-time "curves" according to Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, however this curving doesn't account for the fact that everything in the universe, on all scales, is spinning. Nassim Haramein added torque and Coriolis forces to Einstein's filed equations to properly account for the spin of all things. By doing so, Haramein has developed equations that predict the topology of a black hole being not just one that is curving toward singularity, but CURLING toward stillness, like water going down the drain. When you pull the plug out of your bathtub drain the water doesn't just curve and go straight down along the most direct path down the funnel, it spins as it moves down and important to remember, the AIR spins UP.

Where you have a change in density, you get a vortex as the density gradient moves toward centropy, creating dynamic equilibrium otherwise known as a Torus.

Nassim Haramein's paper "The Schwarzschild Proton" presents a new solution for the mass of the proton giving a result that is much heavier than the one standard model predicts. While the standard proton has a mass 10 to the -24g, the proton that Nassim Haramein's equations describe have a mass of 10 to the 14g : a difference of 38 orders of magnitude.

The different measurements occur due to two different ways of measuring the mass of the proton. The standard model ignores the energy-density of the space itself that exists inside the atom through a mathematical trick called "renormalization", whereas Nassim Haramein appropriately accounts for the energy-density of the space itself inside the atom, giving it a much larger value.

The resulting mass shows that the proton itself obeys the Schwarzschild condition of a black hole and has enough mass to actually be considered a miniature black hole itself. The standard model is only accounting for the mass as observed from OUTSIDE the proton, whereas Nassim is accounting for the mass inside the proton which includes the mass dilation that occurs INSIDE the event horizon of the mini black hole. Mass increases exponentially if it is spinning at a rate that approaches the speed of light inside the event horizon of any black hole (black whole).

When you place both proton measurements into a graph and compare the proton mass vs. the proton radius along with many other known objects in the universe, a linear relationship of mass vs. radius pattern arises. The Schwarzschild proton fits in perfect alignment with all other objects on all scales in it's relationship of mass vs. radius, whereas the standard model proton falls way off the graph. The proton, the sun and the galaxy are all centered by various scale black holes, all centered by singularity.

Everything in the universe is centered by stillness. Space-time curls like water going down the drain to the singularity in the center of black holes on all scales in the infinite scalar tetrahedral geometry of fabric of the vacuum...

For more details, see the "The Schwarzschild Proton" paper and "Scale unification: a universal scaling law" paper themselves:

Animated Yin-Yang symbol

If you wanted to somehow illustrate the complex vorticular dynamics of the dualTorus structure that defines black holes on all scales all in one simple 2-dimensional symbol, you might draw something similar to the ancient Chinese Yin and Yang symbol.

This animation, which was created by animators directed by Nassim Haramein for his "Black Whole" DVD, shows how the dual torus and the Yin Yang are describing the very same dynamics through animated graphics.

The "Black Whole" DVD and the "Crossing the Event Horizon" 4 DVD set are both available from the The Resonance Project Foundation:

Proper application of moving electric charges 

NEXT STEP: Putting it all together to reveal the pattern and relationship to the Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law 

Tom Beardon' s "Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (MEG)", However this is only a bench "proof of principle", it needs more development, HOWEVER one can still validate the MEG'S current potential for conversion of ZPE or the "vacuum" into useful work.

JLN has created a successful replication of the Motionless  Electromagnetic Generator of Tom Bearden.  Has produced up to 100 times more power than was input, by extracting free energy from the vacuum. The MEG has been independently constructed, and its overunity performance independently replicated, by other researchers. US Patent awarded March 26, 2002. Invented by Tom Bearden and four colleagues.


Space-Time And The Speed Of Light | Einstein's Relativity - initial and stagnant interpretation

Lorentz Transformation Window

POINTS OF REFERENCE: Keep the Eye on the Ball 
 we still do not have feedback from any reader’s insights on the effects a varying VC differential, as frequency, would exhibit between any 2 or more stationary objects


With space and time constant between any two or more specified reference points, as an energy differential in frequency approaches and exceeds the quantity VC, four critical components must be reconsidered:

  • VC potential differential: already exists between matter and electrons (electric, magnetic, gravitational fields)
  • Simultaneity: events which are observed simultaneously, occur simultaneously insofar as that observer is concerned, and the simultaneity of events is a condition which depends entirely upon the position of the observer with respect to those events.
  • VC definition: the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter – the pivotal point about which the natural laws (space time mass matter energy gravity) become manifest
  • Gravity: the positive and negative charges of the protons and electrons, when united within the neutron, are not discernible as charges but exist as energy which produces the gravitational field

No comments:

Post a Comment