Sunday, February 23, 2014

Revisiting NASA’s "Is Warp Drive Possible?"

Revisiting:  NASA’s Wormhole Warp through curved space, back and forth through time – all nonexistent possibilities

Is Warp Drive Possible?
NASA researchers have actually been testing actual faster-than-light warp drive practicality. By re-imagining of an Alcubierre Drive, it may eventually result in an engine that can transport a spacecraft to the nearest star in a matter of weeks — and all without violating Einstein's law of relativity.
Star Trek's warp drive may not be restricted to the world of science fiction after all.  A few months ago, physicist Harold White shocked the aeronautics world when he announced that he and his team at NASA had begun work on the development of a warp drive. His proposed design, an ingenious re-imagining of an Alcubierre Drive, may eventually result in an engine that can transport a spacecraft to the nearest star in a matter of weeks. Read more: http://www.33rdsquare.com/2013/06/is-warp-drive-possible.html#ixzz2u5lfkQG2

The Alcubierre drive

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive The Alcubierre drive or Alcubierre metric (referring to metric tensor) is a speculative idea based on a solution of Einstein's field equations in general relativity as proposed by theoretical physicist Miguel Alcubierre, by which a spacecraft could achieve faster-than-light travel if a configurable energy-density field lower than that of vacuum (i.e. negative mass) could be created. Rather than exceeding the speed of light within its local frame of reference, a spacecraft would traverse distances by contracting space in front of it and expanding space behind it, resulting in effective faster-than-light travel.

“Two Loopholes to alter the properties of space and time”:
·        One is a wormhole
·        The other is a space warp

Non-programmed re-assessment of basic science fundamentals

Non-programmed re-assessment of basic science fundamentals, with critical, creative thought derived from self-discovery are now necessary to update, upgrade and revise physics’ standard model.   The stumbling blocks of “local frame of reference” across extreme scale variances, among all intertwined factors of nature (space-time-mass-matter-energy-gravity), without a common denominator, interjected with erroneously defined complex numbers and the square root of -1 ………………. will not go away using a ‘buggy whip’ tool (from horse and buggy days) to drive a starship.

Not to insult anyone’s intelligence, let us look at a very basic simple concept – going from Chicago to New York at three different speeds, to review and identify the factors in play.

In the walk and flight time sceniaros, distance only appears to have shortened, due to the far less time involved (2nd option), caused by the greater energy differential substituted for the time variable.

With this obvious clue (energy-time substitution) providing insight to the total interdependent relationships between space-time-mass-matter-energy-gravity, we will challenge the reader to do some critical thinking of the factors involved on the third option, Chgo to NY @ VC (velocity of light) speed.

Recognition of what you can or cannot SEE, by science’s  own definition of light, and the fact that the VC energy differential, the quantity C, is the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter will go a long ways toward clearing up wormholes, space and time curves and warps, black and white holes, and many other interferences, obstructions, blocking our expanding window to reality.

Recall:  The Natural laws of space-time-mass-matter-energy-gravity are not absolute, but relative. That is, the size and shape of the curve of one law is dependent upon the value and position of the others - and /or - the value of one can be altered between any two reference points by altering the value or relationship of the other. In this example, we note time and energy’s relationship variance follows the same curve of natural law which is apparent in the operation of all the basic factors of nature, and again the radius of that curvature is measured by the quantity C. The natural laws do not follow a straight line reaching to infinity, but a curve of finite radii. In a timeless universe, this curve, in any given plane, would be represented by a circle, but since the laws operate through time as well as space, the curve may be more readily understood if depicted as a "sine curve" or "wave". The "base" line of the wave (which is the center line of the curve) represents zero, and the portions above and below the line represent the positive and negative aspects of the law.  Thus we see that there are points and conditions in which the natural laws reach zero value with respect to a given reference point, and that beyond these points the laws become negative, reversing their effect with respect to the observer. The "limitations of relativity" will always precede us at a distance equal to the radius of curvature of natural law. We need not fear that we will ever overtake or be hampered in any way by those limitations, since our 'reference point' (of a true coordinate system) will always go along with us. The value of the natural laws (gravitational field included) at any given point is controlled by the values of the other factors of nature at that point.

Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law: