Dances With Waves

Dances with waves: Breakthrough in moving small objects using acoustic

 

Exploring Levitation

The Coolest Things Sound Waves Do

  

Exploring Levitation, Energy, and Antigravity

American Antigravity is a good and exhaustive intro, history and summary of events to date

Breakthrough from moving small objects to .... finally ....moving large objects

The basic fundamentals and their relationship to each other

FOR A FASTER MERGER PACE OF PAST AND PRESENT - Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  

The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:

• • The Quantity C: Possessing a Significance Far Greater than Attributed
  • Gravity – As Viewed Through the Radius (VC)
  • Space as Observed through the Curve of Radius Light
  • Matter and Mass – Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass
  • Beyond A Uni-Dimensional Perception of TIME
  • The Nonlinearity of Physical Law
  • Definition 

  

Irish researchers join international team to make a breakthrough in fundamental physics

This is a very exciting breakthrough?

Breakthrough in fundamental physics: An international team of researchers have for the first time, discovered that in a very high magnetic field an electron with no mass can acquire a mass. Understanding why elementary particles e.g. electrons, photons, neutrinos have a mass is a fundamental question in Physics and an area of intense debate. 

 "This is a very exciting breakthrough because until now, nobody has ever discovered an object whose mass can be switched on or off by applying an external stimulus. Every physical object has a mass, which is a measure of the object's resistance to a change in its direction or speed, once a force is applied.

Was this not common sense and common knowledge?

The electron has mass only because it has an electric charge. As we know, when an electric charge is accelerated in space, a magnetic field is produced, and energy is required to produce this field. The energy 'spent' in producing this field, is said to be the 'mass' of the electron, since it is the entire cause of its resistance to acceleration.

All the natural laws possess, not only a two-way interaction as electric ↔ magnetic, but all interactions of – space time mass matter energy gravity/(fields) - are relative to each other . That is, the value of one can be altered between any two reference points by altering the value or relationship of the other, with all following the sine wave nature of reality whose radius is C, the C in E=mc2.

Contemporary partial definition: “Each electron is surrounded by a force called an electric field. When an electron moves, it creates a second field—a magnetic field. When electrons are made to flow in a current through a conductor, such as a piece of metal or a coil of wire, the conductor becomes a temporary magnet—an electromagnet.”

Why wouldn’t a high magnetic field be capable of creating a mass to an electron? Perhaps added to the overall confusion is the enormous narrow-minded misconception from E=mc2 that the speed of light is the dead end limit to velocity.  The belief that gravity has only one pole adds to the delusion of a pseudo reality as ‘real’.

More on Matter and Mass: Much of the confusion which exists in our scientific concepts today is brought about by our failure to distinguish carefully between matter and mass. Until a comparatively few years ago, it was assumed that mass was a property which was exhibited only by matter. Upon closer examination, however, it appeared that energy also possesses mass, since when energy was added to a body of matter, the mass of the body was increased.
We should, perhaps, pause at this point to define the terms which we are using lest we add to the confusion instead of resolving it. Mass is defined as resistance to change in the existing state of motion. It is measured by the amount of the energy which is required to produce a given change in velocity. All matter has the property of mass, but not all mass has the properties of matter. For the purposes of this discussion, we will postulate that there are two types of mass, inertial mass, which is simply the property of resistance to change in a state of motion, and the mass inherent in matter, which we will call Newtonian mass, because it includes all mass which obeys the original laws laid down by Sir Isaac Newton.
Since the reader may be under the impression that all mass obeys the Newtonian laws, let us pause here long enough to examine the facts and to point out the differences in the properties of inertial and Newtonian mass. All physicists of today are agreed that the electron has mass. Yet if it were possible for us to hold an electron between two of our fingers and then suddenly release it, we would find that there was not the slightest tendency for the electron to fall to the earth (unless the surface happened to be positively charged at the moment). The electron is not in the least affected by the gravitational field of the earth, so long as it is at rest with respect to that field (if the electron is moving through the field, however, the direction of the motion will be affected).
 The electron has mass only because it has an electric charge. As we know, when an electric charge is accelerated in space, a magnetic field is produced, and energy is required to produce this field. The energy 'spent' in producing this field, is said to be the 'mass' of the electron, since it is the entire cause of its resistance to acceleration. The greater the degree of acceleration, of course, the more intense the field, and the greater the amount of energy required to produce it. So we say that the electron gains 'mass' with every increase in its velocity. If an electron could be accelerated to the velocity C, (commonly called the velocity of light), it would have acquired the maximum velocity with which energy can be propagated.
It is obvious, therefore, that no amount of energy could further accelerate this electron. (with respect to its original reference point), so it would be considered to have acquired 'infinite mass.'
 Let us take time to examine this statement carefully, since it is a point upon which there is much confusion. The electron would have acquired infinite mass only in reference to its original energy level. If observed from a reference point which had itself received the same degree of acceleration, the mass of the electron would not have changed a particle. This increase of inertial mass with increasing velocity is simply the measure of the kinetic energy differential between the observer and the point which he is observing.

The basic fundamentals and their relationship to each other

FOR A FASTER MERGER PACE OF PAST AND PRESENT - Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  

The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:

• • The Quantity C: Possessing a Significance Far Greater than Attributed
  • Gravity – As Viewed Through the Radius (VC)
  • Space as Observed through the Curve of Radius Light
  • Matter and Mass – Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass
  • Beyond A Uni-Dimensional Perception of TIME
  • The Nonlinearity of Physical Law
  • Definition 

  

Critical Updates in Today’s Highly Advanced and Costly Pseudo Science of “Bigger Boom Boom”

Fusion Laser – Omega - Z Machine – Hadron - SpaceX … All Big Bang, Boom Boom, and Eventual Bust? 

Giant U.S. fusion laser might never achieve goal, report concludes

National Ignition Facility May Never Ignite, DOE Admits

Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Large Hadron Collider to 2025 and beyond

arxiv.org › physics

Disappointment as Large Hadron Collider particle data disappears

Explosion rocks SpaceX launch site in Florida during test  9/1/16 CBS

Perimeter Institute Paving the Road Past 2D Short Sighted Boom Boom Vision? 

PERIMETER PARTICLE PHYSICIST EARNS EARLY RESEARCHER AWARD - Arvanitaki, who holds the inaugural Stravros Niarchos Foundation Aristarchus Chair at Perimeter Institute, is exploring novel experimental approaches to particle physics that may be done with small-scale experiments rather than enormous colliders. 

============ This blog’s suggestion ==============

·                  AN ALTERNATIVE TO BIG BOOM BOOM APPROACH   Gravity – As Viewed Through the Radius (VC)

 There is conclusive evidence that the attraction, called the binding energy, which exists between the Newtonian particles, (the protons and the neutrons) is intense almost beyond our ability to describe. This force, however, does not increase uniformly with increasing mass, but at certain points not only reaches zero but actually becomes negative.

 We can demonstrate this fact by adding a single unit of Newtonian mass, a neutron, to the nucleus of an atom of Uranium 235. When this is done, we find that the gravitational force within the nucleus, instead of increasing actually becomes negative, that is, the attraction between its parts becomes a repulsion, and the parts begin to separate with considerable brisance. During the expansion, however, several new centers of gravity are formed, which, because of the smaller amount of mass involved in each, are strongly positive. The result is that two or more simpler atoms are formed, plus a few neutrons which have acquired too great a velocity to be captured by this regrouping process.

 In most text books, this phenomenon is described as the 'splitting' of the atom. There is an implication that it is the 'impact', or the kinetic energy of the neutron which causes the atom to split. If this were true, then obviously, a high speed neutron would split the atom more easily and surely than one with much lower speed. Actually, the opposite situation is true. The high speed neutron will not split the uranium atom at all. It must be slowed to thermal velocity so that it can settle into the nucleus before fission occurs.

 Occasionally a neutron will be captured by a uranium atom, without falling directly into the nucleus. The neutron may orbit the nucleus for a very long time (as time is counted in nuclear physics), perhaps several seconds or even minutes. Eventually the neutron drops into the nucleus, and 'delayed fission' occurs, again demonstrating the fact that it is not the impact of the neutron, but its presence in the nucleus, which results in its expansion.

 The expansion and subsequent condensation into several simpler atoms is a completely random process.  Many simpler types of atom can, and do result from the condensation, in each case however, the smaller atoms cannot contain as many neutrons in proportion to the number of protons as the larger atom, so there are always several neutrons left over.

 This phenomenon, if carefully examined and considered, will furnish several strong clues to the nature of gravity itself, but let us for the moment, content ourselves with the observation that it demonstrates that a gravitational field can, under certain conditions, become negative.

The more subtle, simpler the foundation, the more complex, profound, powerful, the possible applications become without the consequences of a boom boom pseudo science perspective

Explosion rocks SpaceX launch site in Florida during test  9/1/16 CBS

In the meantime, the University of Rochester’s Omega laser and Sandia National Laboratories’ Z machine—both also supported by the NNSA’s inertial confinement fusion program—continue research on alternative approaches to ignition. Omega, a glass laser like NIF, uses direct drive, which brings beams to impinge directly on targets; Z uses electromagnetic fields to produce implosions.

http://www.lle.rochester.edu/omega_facility/omega/index.php 

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/10/z-machine-makes-progress-toward-nuclear-fusion 

The chances of discovering a particle that seemed imminent due to recent data provided by the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has decreased after what seemed like significant data pointing to the discovery has now disappeared.

A Better Way

Answers reside in a 3D version (analogy) of the current 'flat' concept of E=mc2, along with much needed, integrated, refined, and redefined views of space time mass matter energy gravity. Any questions the reader may have on this subject can only be intelligently discussed when the following 4th grade level concepts pertaining to "the radius of curvature of all natural law' are read, and light, the C in mc2 is recognized as this radius - a concept understood in the distant past and symbolized, staring us in the face for thousands of years, in the sine wave of the Yin Yang. 

Exploring Energy Evolution

FOR A FASTER MERGER PACE OF PAST AND PRESENT - Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  

The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:

• • The Quantity C: Possessing a Significance Far Greater than Attributed
  • Gravity – As Viewed Through the Radius (VC)
  • Space as Observed through the Curve of Radius Light
  • Matter and Mass – Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass
  • Beyond A Uni-Dimensional Perception of TIME
  • The Nonlinearity of Physical Law
  • Definition 

  

Merging Realities

We may be about to solve one of the biggest mysteries in the universe

The discovery of gravitational waves in February is leading to remarkable new insights in physics. One of the most promising is identifying what dark matter is made of, the elusive missing majority of the universe that we know is out there but can’t detect directly. NASA Cosmologist Alexander Kashlinsky thinks that black holes could be the answer, and that detecting gravitational waves could be the best way to confirm it. Here’s how.

Video courtesy of NASA. 

Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass

Merger factor
Unraveling the GREAT BARRIER REEF between micro, meso, macro unity.

FOR A FASTER MERGER PACE OF PAST AND PRESENT - Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  

The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:

• • The Quantity C: Possessing a Significance Far Greater than Attributed
  • Gravity – As Viewed Through the Radius (VC)
  • Space as Observed through the Curve of Radius Light
  • Matter and Mass – Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass
  • Beyond A Uni-Dimensional Perception of TIME
  • The Nonlinearity of Physical Law
  • Definition 

  

The broader the picture, the greater the simplicity with its attendent, ever superior, miraculous possibilities

Personal computers outperforming supercomputers? 

ALWAYS: the broader the picture (gestalt) of reality,, the closer we approach the utter simplicity of everything ............. as simultaneously, the doors of reality open to ever greater, more astounding, miraculous, possibilities

As in the past, the analogy of a round earth (larger viewing point) offering more opportunities than a flat earth concept, so too the standard model of physics, especially E=MC2, would be well advised to perceive the 3D view and relationships of space time mass matter energy gravity (addendum end of post).

"..........this table appeared to look like a monitor screen with tens of billions of pixels, and with a good GPU it was quite possible to calculate all of these. 'We reached the speed we couldn't even dream of,' Vladimir Kukulin said. 'The program computes 260 million of complex double integrals on a desktop computer within three seconds only. We do in 15 minutes what the largest supercomputers in Germany do in three days. No comparison with supercomputers! "

One may well imagine the eventual outcomes as these slightly adapted personal computers are made available to all physics students.





No need in supercomputers

by Staff WritersMoscow, Russia (SPX) Jul 03, 2016

A group of physicists from the Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, the Lomonosov Moscow State University, has learned to use personal computer for calculations of complex equations of quantum mechanics, usually solved with help of supercomputers. This PC does the job much faster. An article about the results of the work has been published in the journal Computer Physics Communications.

Senior researchers Vladimir Pomerantcev and Olga Rubtsova, working under the guidance of Professor Vladimir Kukulin (SINP MSU) were able to use on an ordinary desktop PC with GPU to solve complicated integral equations of quantum mechanics - previously solved only with the powerful, expensive supercomputers. According to Vladimir Kukulin, personal computer does the job much faster: in 15 minutes it is doing the work requiring normally 2-3 days of the supercomputer time.

The equations in question were formulated in the 60s by the Russian mathematician Ludwig Faddeev. The equations describe the scattering of a few quantum particles, i.e., represent a quantum mechanical analog of the Newtonian theory of the three body systems. As the result, the whole field of quantum mechanics called "physics of few-body systems" appeared soon after this.

This area poses a great interest to scientists engaged in quantum mechanics, nuclear and atomic physics and the theory of scattering. For several decades after the pioneering work of Faddeev one of their main purposes was to learn to solve these complicated equations. However, due to the incredible complexity of the calculations in the case of fully realistic interactions between a system's particles stood out of the researchers' reach for a long time, until the supercomputers appeared.

The situation changed dramatically after the group of SINP decided to use one of the new Nvidia GPs designed for use in game consoles on their personal computer. According to one of the authors Vladimir Kukulin, Head of Laboratory of Nuclear Theory, the processor was not the most expensive, of those that you can buy for $ 300-500.

The main problem in solving the scattering equations of multiple quantum particles was the calculation of the integral kernel - a huge two-dimensional table, consisting of tens or hundreds of thousands of rows and columns, with each element of such a huge matrix being the result of extremely complex calculations. But this table appeared to look like a monitor screen with tens of billions of pixels, and with a good GPU it was quite possible to calculate all of these. Using the software developed in Nvidia and having written their own programs, the researchers split their calculations on the many thousands of streams and were able to solve the problem brilliantly.

'We reached the speed we couldn't even dream of,' Vladimir Kukulin said. 'The program computes 260 million of complex double integrals on a desktop computer within three seconds only. No comparison with supercomputers! My colleague from the University of Bochum in Germany (recently deceased, mournfully), whose lab did the same, carried out the calculations by one of the largest supercomputers in Germany with the famous blue gene architecture that is actually very expensive. And what his group is seeking for two or three days, we do in 15 minutes without spending a dime.'

The most amazing thing is that the desired quality of graphics processors and a huge amount of software to them exist for ten years already, but no one used them for such calculations, preferring supercomputers. Anyway, our physicists surprised their Western counterparts pretty much.

'This work, in our opinion, opens up completely new ways to analyze nuclear and resonance chemical reactions,' says Vladimir Kukulin. 'It can also be very useful for solving a large number of computing tasks in plasma physics, electrodynamics, geophysics, medicine and many other areas of science. We want to organize a kind of training course, where researchers from various scientific areas of peripheral universities that do not have access to supercomputers could learn to do on their PCs the same thing that we do.'

FOR A FASTER MERGER PACE OF PAST AND PRESENT - Here is How

A more refined view of E=MC2 discloses Light (C) as The Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law, equating to the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter  
 meaning if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.  

The far more fundamental and simpler definitions of space time mass matter energy gravity become mandatory:

• • The Quantity C: Possessing a Significance Far Greater than Attributed
  • Gravity – As Viewed Through the Radius (VC)
  • Space as Observed through the Curve of Radius Light
  • Matter and Mass – Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass
  • Beyond A Uni-Dimensional Perception of TIME
  • The Nonlinearity of Physical Law
  • Definition