A gram of matter
Einstein's
equation states that the amount of energy you have is equal to the mass
involved times the square of the speed of light. If 1 gram of mass is
converted into energy, then to determine how much energy is involved in ergs,
you just multiply 1 gram by the speed of light squared, in units of
centimeters per second. Energy in ergs = 1 gram x ( 30,000,000,000.0 cm/sec) x
(30,000,000,000.0 cm/sec). This equals 900,000,000,000,000,000,000.0 ergs of
energy.
Though superb advances in Solar, Wind,
Renewables continue, they will be inadequate replacements (but for Hydrogen) to
meet full scale rising energy requirements in the future. These “green energy”
renewables were meant for intermediate supplements caused by the default energy
crises, and for unique
specialties, until such time as the far past due advanced energy concepts are
brought forward into application. “……..Renewable
energy sources such as solar and wind are costly
per unit of output and are intermittent, but can be helpful
at the margin in providing clean power - From Bockris to O’Leary to LENR”
So,
where are we heading as we create bigger and bigger empires to slay…………………???
The Nuclear Option – Take the
Fields out of Hiding – No Bang Bang necessary
Though nuclear power today has an energy content about 3 million
times greater than that of fossil fuel, our current reactors only release a
very small fraction (1/50th) of the total energy content of the
Uranium isotope U-235, while producing, over time, massive amounts of nuclear
waste. http://nuclearinfo.net/Nuclearpower/TheScienceOfNuclearPower
Replace
the ‘new’ horse and buggy analogy with more modern items.
‘Impossible’ Quantum Space
Engine Actually Works – NASA Test Suggests No Fuel
The following statement for releasing nuclear energy is becoming
more and more questionable: “This
energy, however, can be released only by the processes of nuclear fission (.1%), nuclear fusion (1%),[citation
needed] or the annihilation of some or all of the matter in the
volume V by matter-antimatter collisions
(100%)”.
As previously inquired, can nuclear energy be made available in
the form of magnetic, electric, and or gravitational fields through
substitution/transformation?
We now know, based on the Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law
(the quantity C), that the natural laws (of space time mass matter energy
gravity) are relative and mutually dependent. That is, the value of one
can be altered between any two reference points by altering the value or
relationship of the others. This
raises the possibility that nuclear energy potential can be
transformed/substituted and released through fields using approaches other than
fission, fusion or matter-antimatter annihilation.
So we ask again, where did this interchangeable FIELD (electric,
magnetic, gravitational) aspect disappear in modern, nuclear, E=MC2 science? Pun -“disappeared by way of the
Philadelphia Experiment”
All
the Way Down?
From energy to the great, obscene economic divide, followers,
naysayers, skeptics, deniers of inconvenient truth/wage linked, and the
politically correct, continue to paralyze progress with their nose to the
ground “PROVING” the “EARTH IS FLAT” syndrome – which, at their close proximity
level to reference point earth, their
tiny segment of reality IS FLAT (this same tree/forest problem is found in
the contemporary view of both physics and economic standards, flat, straight
and narrow, isolated, unintegrated models). In the narrow view, the moaning continues
that “the iron horse will never move”, more or less responding profusely to the
song “is that all there is”, “YES that is all there is…….” reinforcing Hawkins (Newton’s
Chair 2009) statement (paraphrase) ‘what little we do not know, would not make
a difference in 50 million years’. ....
'because the partial theories we already have are sufficient to make accurate
predictions in all but the most extreme situations' ... 'the ultimate theory of
the universe seems difficult to justify'.
Now
where does that put field propulsion, or movement, transference, from one point
to another without going through all points in between?
The scales have to
connect to the CURVE in E=MC2.
Repeating the flat earth syndrome in
our expanding window to reality is unwise. Selling REALITY short because one may have issues with consciousness, frequency, metaphysics dramatically skews the viewing field - by denying the CURVE. We have not even
approached the beginning of the vast store of knowledge, wisdom, understanding universal reality offers.
