Light – the Radius of Reality
Not for naught are we repeatedly revisiting
contemporary science’s various expanding, yet disconnected, views of the very
large, the very small, the very far (or near) (or in between) – termed
microscopic, mesoscopic, macroscopic scales, each with their independent and
outlandish set of laws and theories blocking major advances and progress
towards breaking the ‘light barrier’ and achieving ‘field propulsion’.
In 1947, Chuck Yeager, an American test
pilot, was the first person to break the sound barrier. Sixty eight years
later, we are not even in the ‘possibility’ consideration of breaking the light
barrier. And we will not attain it until self-realization sets in and unites
the three segments (scales) into the one curve of natural law showing the
simple ease by which antigravity, FTL, field propulsion, and countless other
possibilities can be achieved.
"Physics beyond the Standard Model" embraces the theoretical developments needed to explain the deficiencies of the Standard Model, such as the origin of mass, neutrino oscillations, matter–antimatter asymmetry, and the nature of dark matter and dark energy, as well as the fact that the Standard Model itself is inconsistent with general relativity, to the point that one or both theories break down within known space-time singularities like the Big Bang and black hole event horizons.
From the Standard Model assumptions of
wave/particle duality, to entanglement, simultaneity distortion, statistics vs
cause/effect, missing unified field theory (along with the above mentioned), we
note the major flaws are due to ignoring the radius of reality (radius of
curvature of all natural law), LIGHT, the quantity C, and its affects upon the interconnected,
mutually dependent natural laws of space time mass matter energy gravity.
***It is perfectly possible
to produce a negative gravitational field between the earth and a given
object on or near its surface by the proper application of moving electric
charges. Such a field would be effective only with respect to the
given object. All other matter in the vicinity would remain within the positive
portion of the curve. ***The positive
and negative charges of the protons and electrons, when united within the
neutron, are not discernible as charges but exist as energy which produces the
gravitational field. ***Eventually the neutron drops into the nucleus, and
'delayed fission' occurs, again demonstrating the fact that it is not the
impact of the neutron, but its presence in the nucleus, which results in its
expansion. The expansion and
subsequent condensation into several simpler atoms is a completely random
process. Many simpler types of atom can, and do result from the
condensation, in each case however, the smaller atoms cannot contain as many
neutrons in proportion to the number of protons as the larger atom, so there
are always several neutrons left over. This phenomenon, if carefully
examined and considered, will furnish several strong clues to the nature of
gravity itself.
Simplify the following examples of the very large, very small,
very far with the Light Radius:
The Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law: The
Quantity C: Possessing a Significance Far Greater than Attributed
- Gravity –
As Viewed Through the Radius (VC) - Space as
Observed through the Curve of Radius Light
- Matter and
Mass - Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass
- Beyond A
Uni-Dimensional Perception of TIME - The
Nonlinearity of Physical Law - Integrate,
make the connections: The Connected Universe - How
to think about fields, - Simplifying
the dance-choreography of an electron pair - Atoms to
Galaxies
The Very Large
The Very Small
The self-acceleration of a particle
predicted by this work is indistinguishable from acceleration that would be
produced by a conventional electromagnetic field. It turns
out that this self-acceleration does not actually violate any physical
laws—such as the conservation of momentum—because at the same time the particle
is accelerating, it is also spreading out spatially in the opposite
direction. According to further
analysis, that this self-acceleration produces effects that are associated with
relativity theory: It is a variation on the dilation of time and contraction of
space, effects predicted by Albert Einstein to take place when objects move
close to the speed of light. An
example of this is Einstein's famous twin paradox, in which a twin who travels
at high speed in a rocket ages more slowly than another twin who remains on
Earth. Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-01-analysis-self-propel-subatomic-particles.html#jCp
The Very Large (or Small)
This image combines over 800 terabytes
of information collected by theoretical physicist Kip Thorne, renowned for his
work in astrophysics and gravitational physics and incorporates his theories on
how light may actually bend once it has crossed the event horizon of a black
hole (now known as Kip Thorne Distortion). The film's special effects team
included Paul Franklin who worked with Thorne to incorporate his models of how
black holes warp surrounding time and matter, using the processing power of
their massive graphics renderers to put the data into visual perspective: “We
found that warping space around the black hole also warps the accretion disk…
So rather than looking like Saturn’s rings around a black sphere, the light
creates this extraordinary halo.” -Paul Franklin. As you can see, this new black hole
simulation strongly resembles and supports the model that Nassim Haramein
developed starting well over a decade ago, a toroidal structure where
information is passing BOTH WAYS across the event horizon in the only 2
directions that exist in the universe: in and out. Equal and opposite, as
above, so below. Learn more about
"black wholes" > http://bit.ly/resonance-is-fb1
The Very Small
Do "large" objects play by
different rules? But it could also be that footballs obey completely different
rules than those applying for single atoms.
"There are two different interpretations," says Dr. Andrea
Alberti of the Institute of Applied Physics of the University of Bonn. "Quantum mechanics allows superposition
states of large, macroscopic objects. But these states are very fragile, even
following the football with our eyes is enough to destroy the superposition and
makes it follow a definite trajectory." But which of the two interpretations is correct? Do "large"
objects move differently from small ones? In collaboration with Dr. Clive Emary
of the University of Hull in the U.K., the Bonn team has come up with an
experimental scheme that may help to answer this question. "The challenge
was to develop a measurement scheme of the atoms' positions which allows one to
falsify macro-realistic theories," adds Alberti.
The Very
Far
What do we ‘see’ at +/- VC energy differentials of
space time mass matter energy gravity – across scales micro, meso, to macro - Even
though they captured the radio wave burst while it was happening and
immediately make follow-up observations at other wavelengths, they found
nothing. But did they discover anything?
"We found out what it wasn't. The theories are now that the
radio wave burst might be linked to a very compact type of object - such as
neutron stars or black holes
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-01-snapshot-cosmic-radio.html#jCp
Nonlinearity of physical law http://exploringenergyevolution.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-nonlinearity-of-physical-law.html
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-01-snapshot-cosmic-radio.html#jCp
Nonlinearity of physical law http://exploringenergyevolution.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-nonlinearity-of-physical-law.html
The Very
Small
Soon to cross over
the great micro meso macro divide? Was one ion dead, the other alive? By the
'curve' of the light, the quantity C, we will someday see.
Physicists at the
University of Sussex have tamed one of the most counterintuitive phenomena of
modern science in their quest to develop a new generation of machines capable
of revolutionizing the way we can solve many problems in... more
No comments:
Post a Comment